Skip to content

· Private foundation

Don'T Be a Jerk

$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$690
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Environment$3kRecreation & Sports$200
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$30
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PUBLIC LAND WATER ACCESS ASSOCIATION INC$690
FOSTER THE EARTH$500
COOPERATIVE WILDERNESS HANDICAPPED OUTDOOR GROUP CO IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COOPERATIVE WILDERNESS HANDICAPPED OUTDOOR GROUP CO IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY: $200 → 13%PUBLIC LAND WATER ACCESS ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 10%FOSTER THE EARTH: $500 → 11%PUBLIC LAND WATER ACCESS ASSOCIATION INC: $690 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Accessible Alpine Adventure Tours
Health
2
Girls On Shred

Our mission is to empower youth and marginalized genders including women non-binary, and trans folk, and build community through action sports skill-building, equipment sharing, and accessible community events. We seek to transform…

Youth Development
3
Inclusive Ski Touring

We provide financially accessible group programs in order to develop an inclusive uphill community and offer opportunities for individuals of all backgrounds to try ski touring and or split boarding.

Recreation & Sports
4
Edge Outdoors

EDGE Outdoors is a powerful initiative addressing the health disparities faced by Black, Indigenous, and Women of Color (cis, trans, queer) by dismantling systemic barriers to wellness and outdoor recreation, particularly within snow…

—
5
Runners for Public Lands

We empower runners to protect public lands, engage in climate action, and expand access to nature for all. Runners are motivated to be involved in their local communities to protect cherished landscapes and expand access to nature.…

Environment
6
Jackson Hole Nordic Alliance

Jackson hole nordic alliance connects people & winter trails. we are the resource hub for local nordic, fat bike, snowshoe & trail information. we help build the winter trails community & promote responsible recreation.

Recreation & Sports
7
Mountain Pride

Mountain pride is addressing these challenges by increasing year-round programming for the lgbtqia community in addition to the annual pride in the park. mountain pride is devoted to strengthening its foundation and expanding its reach as…

Health
8
Tahoe Backcountry Alliance

The Tahoe Backcountry Alliance is the voice for the human-powered winter backcountry community in the Lake Tahoe area, advocating for and informing our community about critical issues affecting winter backcountry recreation in and around…

Environment
9
Evergreen Mountain Bike Alliance

Evergreen's mission is to create, maintain, and protect sustainable mountain biking opportunities in Washington State.

Environment
10
Overland Mountain Bike Association

Promote and support skills and safety for mountain biking in and around the front range of northern Colorado and southern Wyoming. This includes trail upkeep and expansion and safe biking education.

Recreation & Sports
11
Mountain Performing Arts Inc
Arts & Culture
12
Camp Bullwheel Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Red Ants Pants Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hotdog Safari Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 3 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
0/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Public Land Water Access Association: $2,190 · OtherPublic Land Water Access AssociationFOSTER THE EARTH: $500 · OtherFOSTER THE EARTHCOOPERATIVE WILDERNESS HANDICAPPED OUTDOOR GROUP CO IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY: $200 · OtherCOOPERATIVE WILDERNESS HANDICAPPED OUTDOOR GROUP CO IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY
Other$2,890

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPublic Land Water Access Association: $2,190 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Public Land Water Access Association ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Don'T Be a Jerk funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Don'T Be a Jerk. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Don'T Be a Jerk?

    Find your warmest path to Don'T Be a Jerk through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Don'T Be a Jerk’s filings →

    More from the funding graph