Skip to content

· Public charity

Dogtopia Foundation

Placing service dogs and training to support returning us veterans with disabilities that require service animals.

$858k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$576k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $270k
  • $250k+1 grant · $576k
$102,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$652k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
K9S FOR WARRIORS$576,300
AMERICAS VET DOGS$107,100
CANINE COMPANIONS$102,000
UNIVERISTY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION$60,800
PAWS4PEOPLE$12,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $138k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CANINE COMPANIONS: $102k → 9%PAWS4PEOPLE: $24k → 12%PAWS4PEOPLE: $12k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 3 repeat orgs$217k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

$1.3M
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+36%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $163k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesPublic BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • K9S FOR WARRIORS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +12%
  • AV
    AMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $191k · revenue +8%
  • PI
    PAWS4PEOPLE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $36k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • PAWS ASSISTING VETERANSgraduated
    3× · 2022–2024 · $48k · revenue +36%
  • PP
    PET PARTNERS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $6k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Patriot Paws Service Dogs

To train and provide service dogs of the highest quality at no cost to disabled american veterans and others with mobile disabilities in order to help restore their physical and emotional independence.

Human Services
2
A Cause to Give Us Paws

Service Dog training for Disabled Veterans

Animals
3
Pets for Vets Inc

Pets for Vets enriches the lives of veterans by creating a life-changing Super Bond with expertly selected and trained shelter or rescue pets. It provides ongoing expert support to ensure a reciprocal and thriving partnership at no cost to…

Public Benefit
4
Pawsitivity

Train and place service dogs at no cost with U.S. military veterans with PTSD and other disabilities to increase independence.

Human Services
5
Leashes of Valor

Our organization's mission is to raise awareness for and provide physical aid and support to disabled us military veterans. our program covers a crucial gap in the industry-a veteran operated organization, that can assist veterans with…

Public Benefit
6
Warrior Canine Connection Inc

Support recovering combat veterans & their families utilizing service dog training/placement.

Human Services
7
Vetpets

To train and provide assistance dogs for veterans.

Animals
8
For Veterans Sake Foundation

For veteran's sake foundation is here to provide an alternative solution to dealing with pts (post traumatic stress). we use a combination of a (non-therapeutic) neuro-traumatic resourcing, service dogs and consulting. working with the…

Health
9
Paws of War Inc

To rescue, train and place shelter dogs to serve and provide independence to our veterans & first responders that suffer the traumatic effects of war, and provide essential and supportive services to our heroes in need.

Animals
10
Paws 4 Liberty Inc

Raising and training service dogs for disabled military vets.

Human Services
11
United States War Dogs Association Inc

The mission of the corporation is to provide support for the war dogs of the united states military. the organization provides care packages to war dogs and their handlers serving overseas. the organization also provides support for…

Animals
12
Dogs for Life Inc

The corporation's mission is to improve the quality of life for people and dogs through training assistance dogs, pet therapy dogs, and owning and operating an off-leash dog park. the corporation also assists with enhancing the quality of…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is PAWS4PEOPLE; the most unlike its peers is University of Arizona Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

K9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $1,086,300 · AnimalsK9S FOR WARRIORS INCPAWS ASSISTING VETERANS: $48,000 · Animals+1 more: $6,000 · AnimalsAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC: $191,100 · Public BenefitAMERICA'S VETD…CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $102,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COM…PAWS4PEOPLE INC: $36,000 · Human ServicesPAWS4PEOPL…University of Arizona Foundation: $60,800 · Education
Animals$1,140,300Public Benefit$191,100Human Services$138,000Education$60,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $1,086,300 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC: $191,100 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $102,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $60,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS ASSISTING VETERANS: $48,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetPAWS4PEOPLE INC: $36,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPET PARTNERS: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dogtopia Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dogtopia Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dogtopia’s filings →

More from the funding graph