Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

District No1 - Pacific Coast District Meba

To represent marine officers and other professionals, and to elevate and maintain their rights and advance and safeguard the economic and working conditions of the members and otherwise labor for their better protection and advancement.

$48k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
2
Itemized grants FY2024
1
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$17k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$10,000
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$34M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Human Services$10kEducation$10kPublic Benefit$7k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Meba D-1 Pcd Good and Welfare Fund$10,0001n/a
National Democratic Club$7,00010%

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($10k), not named here.

Compare District No1 - Pacific Coast District Meba with peer funders

About District No1 - Pacific Coast District Meba

How much does District No1 - Pacific Coast District Meba give?
District No1 - Pacific Coast District Meba reported 2 itemized grants totaling $17,000, out of $47,849 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does District No1 - Pacific Coast District Meba fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Human Services (37%), Education (37%), Public Benefit (26%).
Who are District No1 - Pacific Coast District Meba's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2024: Meba D-1 Pcd Good and Welfare Fund ($10k), National Democratic Club ($7k).
Where is District No1 - Pacific Coast District Meba based?
District No1 - Pacific Coast District Meba is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on District No1 - Pacific Coast District Meba’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home