· Public charity
Discovery Triangle Development Corporation
Our goal is to work with community members to create an equitable food system that provides all communities access to healthy, affordable food to help everyone reach their highest potential.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AVERY THERAPEUTICS | $30,000 |
| VAPOMETRY | $30,000 |
| TOUCHPOINT | $20,936 |
| THERASPECS | $18,788 |
| GT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES | $15,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2019, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- IHIRON HORSE DIAGNOSTICS AZ2× · 2017–2018 · $30k
- TTOUCHPOINT2× · 2018–2019 · $30k
- TTHERASPECS2× · 2018–2019 · $30k
Funded once
- GBGEMEO BIOSCIENCE INCone grant, 2018 · $30k
- SBSMART BRAIN AGING INCone grant, 2017 · $30k
- PIPHOENIX INTERFACE TECHNOLOGIES LLCone grant, 2017 · $28k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2019.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2019, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Play a game based on Discovery Triangle Development’s filings →