Skip to content

· Public charity

Discovering Healthy Foods

Provide food reimbursement funds to child care and or adult care centers through theTexas Department of Agriculture sponsored by the U S Department of Agriculture

$1.0M
Granted FY2021
13
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$180k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2021.

Food & Nutrition$968kEducation$818kHuman Services$806kReligion$240kYouth Development$182kArts & Culture$55kHealth$9k
02FY2021 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $950,170, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,003,786 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $53,616 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $137k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $813k
$52,347
Median grant
1
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RESIDENTIAL NUTRITION SERVICES INC$179,843
PORTFOLIO RESIDENT SERVICES$144,809
ANOINTED ARK ACADEMY$143,855
SHAMIKAY INC dba RIGHT STEPS CHILDCARE AND ACADEMY$142,252
ABOVE & BEYOND$92,183
SILVER STA R ACADEMY$58,140
TRUE LOVE AT RISK$52,347
TRUE LOVE CHILD CARE$35,368
BIG BLUE MARBLE ACADEMY$27,188
TEALS HEALTHY MEALS$26,119
GREATER GOOD$17,731
MIA'S LEARNING ACADEMY$17,377
PRESCHOOL CONNECTION CDC$12,958
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $205k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PORTFOLIO RESIDENT SERVICES: $145k → 16%PORTFOLIO RESIDENT SERVICES: $60k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 18 repeat orgs$236k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2021, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
5

Total granted

$2.8M
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
0%

Still filing today

11%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $136k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SHAMIKAY INC dba RIGHT STEPS CHILDCARE AND ACADEMY
    4× · 2018–2021 · $491k
  • SS
    SILVER STAR ACADEMY
    4× · 2018–2021 · $298k
  • AA
    ANOINTED ARK ACADEMY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $264k

Funded once

  • LK
    LITTLE KEEPERS HEALTHY EATERS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $43k
  • HH
    HAPPY HEARTS MEALS
    one grant, 2020 · $22k
  • TL
    THE LEARNING EXP KINGSLAND
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2018 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHAMIKAY INC dba RIGHT STEPS CHILDCARE AND ACADEMY: $490,612 · OtherSHAMIKAY INC dba RIGHT STEPS CHILDCARE AND ACADEMYSILVER STAR ACADEMY: $297,916 · OtherSILVER STAR ACADEMYANOINTED ARK ACADEMY: $263,673 · OtherANOINTED ARK ACADEMYRESIDENTIAL NUTRITION SERVICES INC: $254,710 · OtherRESIDENTIAL NUTRITION SERVICES INCTRUE LOVE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $249,606 · OtherTRUE LOVE CHRISTIAN CHURCHDISCOVERING ME ACADEMY: $220,999 · OtherDISCOVERING ME ACADEMYLIL ANGELS CHILDCARE: $155,835 · OtherLIL ANGELS CHILDCAREBIG BLUE MARBLE ACADEMY: $121,424 · OtherTRUE LOVE CHILD CARE: $115,934 · OtherEARLY EDUCATIONAL ENTERPRISES: $95,787 · OtherABOVE AND BEYOND MEALS: $92,183 · Other+12 more: $378,420 · Other+12 morePORTFOLIO RESIDENT SERVICES INC: $205,278 · Human ServicesDMF GROUP: $91,529 · Youth DevelopmentLITTLE KEEPERS HEALTHY EATERS INC: $43,404 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,737,099Human Services$205,278Youth Development$91,529Food & Nutrition$43,404

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPORTFOLIO RESIDENT SERVICES INC: $205,278 over 2y, 12% of budgetDMF GROUP: $91,529 over 2y, 100% of budgetImpact Preparatory Academy Inc: $61,996 over 2y, 6.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PORTFOLIO RESIDENT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds DMF GROUP ↗
  • Who funds Impact Preparatory Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE KEEPERS HEALTHY EATERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MASSIES GREATER GOOD FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Collaborative for ChildrenTX13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collaborative for Children

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Discovering Healthy Foods funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Discovering Healthy Foods. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Discovering Healthy Foods?

    Find your warmest path to Discovering Healthy Foods through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Discovering Healthy Foods’ filings →

    More from the funding graph