Skip to content

· Public charity

Dipasquale Moore Law Firm Foundation

The foundation donations and activities benefit hundreds of male and female high school players across ten different schools in kansas city, missouri and kansas city, kansas public school systems who participate in football, volleyball and basketball.

$178k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$257k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $142,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $178,397 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $36,397 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $120k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$13k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KANSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$30,000
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 500$30,000
HUBER HOOPS INC$25,000
MK YOUTH FOUNDATION$25,000
THE TOMMY SIMONE MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND$10,000
CENTER SCHOOL DISTRICT #58$7,000
KC UNITED YOUTH FAMILY SPORTS & EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$5,000
UNIVERSITY ACADEMY$5,000
SCHOLAR SMARTS EDUCATIONAL & EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HUBER HOOPS INC: $25k → 5%UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 500: $30k → 16%THE TOMMY SIMONE MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10k → 8%CENTER SCHOOL DISTRICT #58: $7k → 15%HUBER HOOPS INC: $25k → 5%UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 500: $30k → 16%UNIVERSITY ACADEMY: $5k → 15%MK YOUTH FOUNDATION: $25k → 5%KC UNITED YOUTH FAMILY SPORTS & EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $5k → 16%KANSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $30k → 15%MK YOUTH FOUNDATION: $25k → 5%KC UNITED YOUTH FAMILY SPORTS & EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $5k → 16%KANSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $30k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$230k · 5 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$230k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

60%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 500 KANSAS CITY KS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $60k
  • KC
    KANSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $60k · revenue +294%
  • MY
    MK YOUTH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • TT
    THE TOMMY SIMONE MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2025 · $10k
  • CH
    CENTER HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTER CLUB INC
    one grant, 2025 · $7k
  • UA
    UNIVERSITY ACADEMY
    one grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/5
Grantees still filing
1/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 500 KANSAS CITY KS PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $60,000 · OtherUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 500 KANSAS CITY KS PUBLIC SCHOO…HUBER HOOPS INC: $50,000 · OtherHUBER HOOPS INCTHE TOMMY SIMONE MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 · OtherTHE TOMMY SIMONE MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUNDCENTER HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTER CLUB INC: $7,000 · OtherSCHOLAR SMARTS EDUCATIONAL & EMPLOYMENT SYSTEMS: $5,000 · OtherKANSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $60,000 · EducationKANSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATIONMK YOUTH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationMK YOUTH FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY ACADEMY: $5,000 · EducationKC UNITED YOUTH FAMILY SPORTS & EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$132,000Education$115,000Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKANSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetMK YOUTH FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetKC UNITED YOUTH FAMILY SPORTS & EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dipasquale Moore Law Firm Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dipasquale Moore Law Firm Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dipasquale Moore Law Firm Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Dipasquale Moore Law Firm Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dipasquale Moore Law Firm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph