Skip to content

· Private foundation

Diodes Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$190k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.3MFood & Nutrition$33kInternational$30kEducation$16kScience & Tech$12kRecreation & Sports$4kHealth$2kPhilanthropy$500
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$100,000
THE PINNACLE LEARNING TRUST$30,000
CHINESE INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERS USA INC$12,000
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$10,000
UNITED WAY INC$10,000
DALLAS ASIAN AMERICAN YOUTH ORCHESTRA$7,500
South Portland High School$5,000
PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE AND SCIENCE$5,000
9 11 DAY$4,725
UNITED WAY INC$2,000
DALLAS-FT WORTH CHINESE DOUBLE TENTH CELEBRATION C$1,500
DFWWECARE$1,000
HACK FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 12% of grant dollars ($169k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 88% that went abroad ($1.2M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%9 11 DAY: $5k → 10%HACK FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%FRONT LINE YOUTH IN SCIENCE ENGINEERING AND TECHNO: $5k → 5%DALLAS ASIAN AMERICAN YOUTH ORCHESTRA: $10k → 11%DALLAS-FT WORTH CHINESE DOUBLE TENTH CELEBRATION C: $2k → 14%TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION: $100k → 22%HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $30k → 9%UNITED WAY INC: $10k → 7%FRONT LINE YOUTH IN SCIENCE ENGINEERING AND TECHNO: $2k → 5%DALLAS ASIAN AMERICAN YOUTH ORCHESTRA: $8k → 11%DALLAS-FT WORTH CHINESE DOUBLE TENTH CELEBRATION C: $2k → 14%TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION: $15k → 22%HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%UNITED WAY INC: $2k → 7%DALLAS-FT WORTH CHINESE DOUBLE TENTH CELEBRATION C: $2k → 5%PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE AND SCIENCE: $8k → 14%TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION: $10k → 22%South Portland High School: $5k → 7%ECLAT FOUNDATION: $1k → 5%DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC Dallas Symphony: $7k → 14%South Portland High School: $5k → 7%NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $17k → 5%PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE AND SCIENCE: $5k → 14%BUILDING STEAM: $4k → 7%NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $17k → 5%PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE AND SCIENCE: $5k → 14%DALLAS ASIAN AMERICAN YOUTH ORCHESTRA: $3k → 5%PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE AND SCIENCE: $4k → 14%DFWWECARE: $1k → 5%DFWWECARE: $500 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 88% of all-years giving ($1.2M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Taiwan$1.2M · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 22% of Diodes Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Diodes Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 88% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 10 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against -55% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$1.5M
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
-55%

Still filing today

70%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationHealthScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $125k · revenue +28%
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    2× · 2023–2024 · $33k · revenue +29%
  • PM
    PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $21k · revenue +247%

Funded once

  • FL
    FRONT LINE YOUTH IN SCIENCE ENGINEERING AND TECHNO
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • DS
    DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION INC Dallas Symphony
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • BS
    BUILDING STEAM
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
2
National Engineers Week Foundation

Discovere is a coalition providing every student with a shared stem experience and the resources, programs, and connections to improve the understanding of engineering through a united voice and a global distribution network. discovere…

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
University of Science and Technology of China Alumni Foundation

Promote the excellence of members of USTC and helping the students with finacial needs. Promote the academic and cultural exchange between USTC and researchers and students in USA Raising donations from alumni and elsewhere. Present…

International
5
National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering Inc

To provide leadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of successful african american, native american and latinx women and men in engineering and technology, math, and science-based careers.

Civil Rights
6
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
7
Texas Academy of Medicine Engineering Science and Technology

To provide broader recognition of the state's top achievers in medicine, engineering and science, and to build a stronger identity for texas as an important destination and center of achievement in these fields.

Health
8
The University of Texas Foundation No 1

To support the university of texas system

—
9
Tamuhack

TAMUhack is a hackathon organization dedicated to hosting hackathons for college students. We organize 2 hackathons annually, our flagship hackathon, TAMUHack, and our beginner-friendly hackathon, HowdyHack. Each year, we have over 800…

Education
10
Forty First Foundation

The forty first foundation supports and advances the university of texas at austin in its pursuit of excellence. we work closely with the office of the president to identify, fund, and implement strategic initiatives that enhance the…

Education
11
Texas Food & Fuel Association Scholarship Foundation

The texas food & fuel association scholarship foundation awards scholarships to outstanding students in the state of texas.

Education
12
Fudan University Education Development Foundation

1) Support academic research and talents cultivation in Fudan University. 2) Promote higher education in Fudan University and other educational organizations in China. 3) Strengthen global cooperations of education and research. 4) Enhance…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas a&M Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Chinese Institute of Engineers Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ALLIANCE CULTURAL FOUNDATION: $1,200,000 · OtherTHE ALLIANCE CULTURAL FOUNDATION+7 more: $95,782 · Other+7 moreTexas A&M Foundation: $125,000 · EducationTexas A&M…CHINESE INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERS USA INC: $44,000 · Arts & CulturePEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE: $21,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS ASIAN AMERICAN YOUTH ORCHESTRA (DAAYO): $20,500 · Arts & CultureCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $30,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way Inc: $12,000 · Philanthropy911 DAY: $4,725 · Philanthropy+2 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthTHE HACK FOUNDATION D/B/A HACK CLUB: $1,000 · Science & Tech
Other$1,295,782Education$125,000Arts & Culture$85,500Philanthropy$49,225Health$2,000Science & Tech$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHINESE INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERS USA INC: $44,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $33,332 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS ASIAN AMERICAN YOUTH ORCHESTRA (DAAYO): $20,500 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetUnited Way Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDFWWECARE: $1,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetECLAT FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Diodes Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Diodes Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Diodes Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Diodes Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Diodes’ filings →

    More from the funding graph