Skip to content
Digestive Health Physicians Association Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Digestive Health Physicians Association Inc

The digestive health physicians association (dhpa) is a trade association of independent gastroenterology (gi) physician practices across the country with the aim of promoting and preserving accessible, high quality and cost-efficient care provided in the independent gi medical practice setting.

$70k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$280k
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$997k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW YORK INDEPENDENT PHYSICIAN PA INC$25,000
WASHINGTON INDEPENDENT PPA - C$25,000
CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT PHYSICIAN PRACTICE$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT PHYSICIAN PRACTICE: $20k → 9%CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT PHYSICIAN PRACTICE: $20k → 9%CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT PHYSICIAN PRACTICE: $20k → 9%CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT PHYSICIAN PRACTICE: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$210k · 4 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
1

Total granted

$210k
$20k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DE
    DEAF ENTREPRENEURSHIP NETWORK INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $80k · revenue +102% · 91% of their budget
  • NJ
    NEW JERSEY PATIENT CARE AND ACCESS COALITION INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue -3%
  • MP
    MARYLAND PATIENT CARE AND ACCESS COALITION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $45k

Funded once

  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON GASTROENTEROLOGY PC
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW JERSEY PATIENT CARE AND ACCESS COALITION INC: $50,000 · OtherNEW JERSEY PATIENT CARE AND ACCESS COALITION INCMARYLAND PATIENT CARE AND ACCESS COALITION: $45,000 · OtherMARYLAND PATIENT CARE AND ACCESS COALITIONWASHINGTON INDEPENDENT PPA - C: $25,000 · OtherWASHINGTON INDEPENDENT PPA - CNEW YORK INDEPENDENT PHYSICIAN PRACTICE ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 · OtherNEW YORK INDEPENDENT PHYSICIAN PRACTICE ASSOCIATION INCGREATER BOSTON GASTROENTEROLOGY PC: $20,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON GASTROENTEROLOGY PCDEAF ENTREPRENEURSHIP NETWORK INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesDEAF ENTREPRENEURSHIP NETWORK IN…CONNECTICUT ASSOCIATION OF AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTERS INC: $35,000 · Community ImprovementCONNECTICUT AS…
Other$165,000Human Services$80,000Community Improvement$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDEAF ENTREPRENEURSHIP NETWORK INC: $80,000 over 4y, 91% of budgetNEW JERSEY PATIENT CARE AND ACCESS COALITION INC: $50,000 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetCONNECTICUT ASSOCIATION OF AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTERS INC: $35,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetNEW YORK INDEPENDENT PHYSICIAN PRACTICE ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Digestive Health Physicians Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Digestive Health Physicians Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Digestive Health Physicians Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home