Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Diamond Blackfan Anemia Foundation

The mission of the DIAMOND BLACKFAN ANEMIA FOUNDATION is to advance research initiatives that promote a better understanding, therapeutic strategies and a cure for this rare bone marrow failure syndrome.

$215k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$70k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Diamond Blackfan Anemia Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
20
2
21
3
23
0
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$529kEducation$120kScience & Tech$15k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $120,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $215,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $95,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$70,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STANFORD UNIVERSITY - DR KATHLEEN SAKAMOTO$70,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY - DR MARIA BARNA$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 71% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL- DRS VIJAY SANKARAN AND RICHARD VOIT: $70k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY - DR KATHLEEN SAKAMOTO: $70k → 7%THE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $113k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE: $15k → 15%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY - DR MARIA BARNA: $50k → 7%JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER- DR LAURA PAULETTE FERNANDEZ- CARDENAS: $67k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $95k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$95k · 100% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: RESEARCH PROPOSAL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Children's Hospital Corporation — $218,408 · HealthChildren's Hospital CorporationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $130,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH — $113,000 · HealthTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCHJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC — $67,314 · HealthJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INCTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $120,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES O…UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILL…
Health$528,722Education$135,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $218,408 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $130,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $120,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH — $113,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC — $67,314 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Diamond Blackfan Anemia Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 35%
  • Joslin Diabetes Center Inc35% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Diamond Blackfan Anemia Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Diamond Blackfan Anemia Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph