Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Diabetes Research Connection

To connect donors with early-career scientists enabling them to perform peer-reviewed research designed to prevent and cure type 1 diabetes, minimize its complications and improve the quality of life for those living with the disease.

$450k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Science & Tech$707kEducation$643kHealth$282kSocial Science$25kRecreation & Sports$25kEmployment$8k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $240k
$40,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$70,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$65,000
BOSTON COLLEGE$55,000
CITY OF HOPE$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF AL BIRMINGHAM$40,000
UNIVERSITY OF CA SF$40,000
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$35,000
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH C$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$10,000
J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOSTON COLLEGE: $55k → 7%CITY OF HOPE: $50k → 10%J Craig Venter Institute: $40k → 11%Regents of University of CA: $9k → 14%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH C: $25k → 12%University of Washington: $35k → 21%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%University of NC Chapel Hill: $40k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $25k → 8%Childrens Diabetes Foundatio: $25k → 12%IN Biosciences Research Inst: $20k → 16%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $65k → 18%The Res Inst at Nationwide Ch: $15k → 15%SIBCR SEA Inst for Bio & CR: $32k → 9%University of Chicago: $75k → 14%The Johns Hopkins U BAL MD: $10k → 19%The Jackson Laboratory: $40k → 11%BOSTON COLLEGE: $25k → 7%CITY OF HOPE: $40k → 10%The Salk Institute: $25k → 11%Medical University of SC: $25k → 12%WA University in SL MO: $10k → 21%University of NC Chapel Hill: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $25k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER: $50k → 12%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $25k → 18%SIBCR SEA Inst for Bio & CR: $10k → 9%University of Chicago: $40k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTI: $10k → 19%The Jackson Laboratory BHME: $40k → 11%J Craig Venter Institute: $25k → 11%University of Washington: $8k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%The Jackson Laboratory: $10k → 11%Sanford Burnham Prebys Medica: $23k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $70k → 9%The Jackson Laboratory BHME: $10k → 11%Sanford Burnham Prebys Medica: $23k → 11%J Craig Venter Institute: $15k → 11%J Craig Venter Institute: $10k → 11%J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE: $10k → 11%University of CA San Diego: $35k → 11%University of CA San Diego: $30k → 11%UCSD: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
IL
MA
IN
OH
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
MD
TN
NC
SC
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 17 repeat orgs$522k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
16

Total granted

$1.2M
$337k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+46%

Still filing today

41%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $185k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22’23’24
EducationHealthScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Chicago
    3× · 2022–2024 · $125k · revenue +22%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $80k · revenue +37%
  • TJ
    THE JACKSON LABORATORY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $50k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • CO
    CITY OF HOPE
    one grant, 2023 · $40k
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue +76%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
6
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

7
The Broad Institute Inc

The mission of the broad institute is to propel progress in biomedicine, through research aimed at the understanding and treatment of disease and the dissemination of scientific knowledge to the scientific community to benefit the public.…

Health
8
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
9
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
10
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
11
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
12
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Chicago and the most unlike its peers is Children's Diabetes Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA — $160,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDAIndiana University School of Medicine — $90,000 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $85,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $70,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONUniversity of CA San Diego — $65,000 · OtherUniversity of CA San DiegoThe Jackson Laboratory BHME — $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH — $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER — $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $50,000 · OtherSanford Burnham Prebys Medica — $46,917 · OtherSIBCR SEA Inst for Bio & CR — $41,566 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM — $40,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPE — $40,000 · Other+12 more — $196,476 · Other+12 moreUniversity of Chicago — $125,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoVanderbilt University — $85,000 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE — $80,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $45,550 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SA…WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $35,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYUniversity of Miami — $25,000 · EducationUniversity of MiamiDUKE UNIVERSITY — $15,000 · EducationTHE JACKSON LABORATORY — $50,000 · HealthCITY OF HOPE — $50,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthJ CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE — $100,000 · Science & TechIndiana Biosciences Research Institute Inc — $20,000 · Science & Tech
Other$1,034,959Education$410,550Health$125,000Science & Tech$120,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Chicago — $125,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJ CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE — $100,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetVanderbilt University — $85,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE — $80,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JACKSON LABORATORY — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF HOPE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $45,550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetIndiana Biosciences Research Institute Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Chicago
  • Who funds J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
  • Who funds THE JACKSON LABORATORY
  • Who funds CITY OF HOPE
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds University of Miami
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Indiana Biosciences Research Institute Inc
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Diabetes Research Connection funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Diabetes Research Connection?

Find your warmest path to Diabetes Research Connection through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph