Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Destwolinski Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$757k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$700k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Education$965kCommunity Improvement$105kReligion$102kHousing & Shelter$45kHuman Services$25kPhilanthropy$20kArts & Culture$19kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
  • $250k+1 grant · $700k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
New Mexico Military Institute Found$700,000
Presbyterian Church of the Cross$25,000
St Andrew by the Bay$22,000
Stephen Siller Tunnels to Tower Fnd$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Wounded Warrior Project: $10k → 14%Wounded Warrior Project: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
NY
NV
IA
NE
VA
MD
AZ
NM
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 6 repeat orgs$233k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +2% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$1.0M
$233k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
0%

Still filing today

50%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NEW MEXICO MILITARY INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $873k · revenue +2%
  • SA
    St Andrew by the Bay
    4× · 2021–2025 · $57k
  • PC
    Presbyterian Church of the Cross
    2× · 2024–2025 · $45k

Funded once

  • JA
    J and D Fitness
    one grant, 2022 · $55k
  • NM
    New Mexico Military Institute Fdtn
    one grant, 2021 · $54k
  • HS
    Hue Salon and Spa
    one grant, 2021 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW MEXICO MILITARY INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $872,500 · EducationNEW MEXICO MILITARY INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC+1 more — $20,000 · EducationSt Andrew by the Bay — $57,000 · OtherSt Andrew by the BayJ and D Fitness — $55,000 · OtherJ and D FitnessNew Mexico Military Institute Fdtn — $54,183 · OtherNew Mexico Military Institute F…Hue Salon and Spa — $50,000 · OtherHue Salon and SpaPresbyterian Church of the Cross — $45,000 · OtherPresbyterian Church of the Cros…Stephen Siller Tunnels to Tower Fnd — $40,000 · OtherStephen Siller Tunnels to Tower…Bishop Helen Catholic Schools — $15,000 · Other+6 more — $38,999 · Other+6 moreUNITED WAY OF SIOUXLAND INC — $20,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $400 · PhilanthropyWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $15,000 · Human Services
Education$892,500Other$355,182Philanthropy$20,400Human Services$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW MEXICO MILITARY INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $872,500 over 4y, 13% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SIOUXLAND INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIAWATHA HOMES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW MEXICO MILITARY INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SIOUXLAND INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds HIAWATHA HOMES INC
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Destwolinski Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph