Skip to content
Degregorio Family Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Degregorio Family Foundation Inc

To fund research and education for the diagnosis and treatment of stomach and esophageal cancer related disorders.

$2.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.9MEducation$1.3MSocial Science$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $175k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.7M
$450,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$1,500,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS$500,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA PERELMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$450,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$250,000
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$175,000
TORREY COAST FOUNDATION$12,432
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $1.5M → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA PERELMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $450k → 22%TORREY COAST FOUNDATION: $12k → 11%University of Southern California: $90k → 14%Weill Cornell Medicine: $125k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $500k → 10%Baylor College of Medicine: $75k → 16%HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $88k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI: $175k → 15%Univerisity of Iowa: $250k → 15%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $100k → 14%Case Western Reserve: $100k → 17%FRED HUTCHISON CANCER REASEARCH CENTER: $99k → 9%John Hopkins University: $200k → 19%INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACION: $10k → 15%Dana Farber Cancer Institute: $500k → 16%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PA: $300k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $85k → 14%Weill Cornell Medicine: $125k → 17%University of Texas at Austin: $88k → 10%Baylor College of Medicine: $75k → 16%Univerisity of Miami: $100k → 15%CASE WESTERN RESERVE: $100k → 17%Dana Farber Cancer Institute: $350k → 16%University of PA: $250k → 22%Cedars - Sinai Medical Center: $90k → 14%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $146k → 17%Univerisity of Miami: $75k → 15%Boston University Grants Receivables: $125k → 16%University of PA Perelman School: $125k → 22%Cedars - Sinai Medical Center: $85k → 14%WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL: $115k → 17%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $125k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PA: $125k → 22%Cedars - Sinai Medical Center: $75k → 14%Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: $113k → 17%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $100k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $25k → 22%CEDARS SINAI MEIDCAL CENTER: $38k → 14%WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE: $83k → 17%BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL RESEARCH: $75k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $20k → 22%Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: $80k → 17%Thomas Jefferson University: $90k → 22%Marc Foundation FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $175k → 17%Thomas Jefferson University: $90k → 22%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $250k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
CA
MD
NM
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 9 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

$4.4M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+27%

Still filing today

78%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $512k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +62%
  • UO
    University of Miami
    3× · 2023–2025 · $350k · revenue +19%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    4× · 2018–2021 · $288k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • SU
    State University of Iowa
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
  • JH
    John Hopkins University
    one grant, 2019 · $200k
  • TM
    THE MARK FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH (US) LTD
    one grant, 2024 · $175k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
4
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
5
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
6
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
7
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
12
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornell University; the most unlike its peers is Torrey Coast Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
18/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $2,450,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $287,500 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTERTHE MARK FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH (US) LTD: $174,514 · HealthTHE MARK FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH (US…+2 more: $175,000 · Health+2 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,295,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIATHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $396,300 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE…University of Miami: $350,000 · EducationUniversity of MiamiCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITYTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $180,000 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $175,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIABaylor College of Medicine: $150,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $118,250 · Education+2 more: $170,000 · Education+2 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOU…Weill Medical College of Cornell Univers: $365,000 · OtherWeill Medical College of Co…TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $250,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSI…State University of Iowa: $250,000 · OtherState University of IowaJohn Hopkins University: $200,000 · OtherJohn Hopkins UniversityMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: $192,500 · OtherMemorial Sloan Kettering Ca…FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $99,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $87,500 · Other+2 more: $20,000 · OtherTORREY COAST FOUNDATION: $12,432 · Philanthropy
Health$3,087,014Education$3,034,550Other$1,964,000Philanthropy$12,432

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $2,450,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1,295,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $396,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $350,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $287,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $250,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $180,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $175,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARK FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH (US) LTD: $174,514 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $99,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $87,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $82,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Degregorio Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Degregorio Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Degregorio Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Degregorio Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Degregorio Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home