Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Debbink Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$471k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$210k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$503kHealth$320kPublic Benefit$255kYouth Development$229kArts & Culture$203kEducation$178kRecreation & Sports$171kFood & Nutrition$86kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $315k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA at Pabst Farms$210,000
Oconomowoc Historical Society$55,000
Wisconsin VFW Foundation Inc$50,000
Fisher House of WI$20,000
Fort Atkinson Community Foundation$15,000
American Heart Association$15,000
Lutheran Homes of Oconomowoc$13,000
Oconomowoc Scholarship Fund$12,000
Oconomowoc Area Food Pantry$10,500
The Womens Center$10,000
Lake Area Free Clinic$10,000
Froedtert Hospital Foundation$5,000
West Bend Historic Theater$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Zachariahs Acres$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $313k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Womens Center: $10k → 5%The Womens Center Inc: $10k → 5%The Womens Center: $10k → 5%Zachariahs Acres: $5k → 5%ZACHARIAHS ACRES INC: $5k → 5%Zachariahs Acres: $5k → 5%Zachariahs Acres: $5k → 5%YMCA at Pabst Farms: $210k → 5%Lutheran Homes of Oconomowoc: $13k → 5%YMCA at Pabst Farms: $10k → 5%ZACHARIAH'S ACRES: $5k → 5%LUTHERAN HOMES OF OCONOMOWOC INC: $5k → 5%Lutheran Homes of Oconomowoc: $5k → 5%Lutheran Homes of Oconomowoc Inc: $5k → 5%ZACHARIAH'S ACRES: $5k → 5%LUTHERAN HOMES OF OCONOMOWOC INC: $5k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Debbink Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in WI; read by stated purpose it is 93% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Debbink Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 41 repeat orgs$392k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
20

Total granted

$1.7M
$342k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
0%

Still filing today

54%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GLACIAL COMMUNITY YMCA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $220k · revenue +10%
  • OH
    OCONOMOWOC HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +82% · 35% of their budget
  • OS
    OCONOMOWOC SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    8× · 2017–2025 · $92k · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • FO
    Friends Oconomowoc Parks and Trails
    one grant, 2024 · $75k
  • OP
    Oconomowoc Parks and Trails
    one grant, 2023 · $70k
  • LA
    LAKE AREA FREE DENTAL CLINIC
    one grant, 2017 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wisconsin Maritime Museum Inc

The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…

Arts & Culture
2
Wisconsin Waterfowl Association Inc

The purpose of the association shall be to restore and conserve wisconsin's waterfowl and wetland resources; to educate state waterfowlers during their progression from natural resource consumer to steward; and to promote governmental…

Environment
3
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

4
Waukesha County Historical Society & Museum Inc

The museum is an educational institution dedicated to preserving the history and culture of waukesha county.

5
Oshkosh Area Community Foundation Corporation

The mission of the oshkosh area community foundation corporation is to strengthen our communities. the organization accomplishes this through: leadership and funding to address current and emerging needs; collaboration and partnership with…

Philanthropy
6
United Way of Wisconsin Inc

United way of wisconsin is dedicated to supporting and enriching a strong statewide united way network that maximizes the capacity of local united ways to address human needs, improve lives and create lasting positive change across…

Philanthropy
7
Landmark Conservancy Inc

Landmark conservancy is a nationally accredited, nonprofit conservation organization serving 20 counties across northwest wisconsin. their mission is to conserve wisconsin's natural legacy for everyone...forever.

Environment
8
Oshkosh Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc

To promote oshkosh and winnebago county a premier destination for corporate, sports, and leisure groups and individual visitors.

9
Wisconsin Association of Lakes Inc

The mission of the wisconsin association of lakes is to conserve, enhance, and restore wisconsin's 15,000 lakes to ensure their sustainability for the benefit and collective use and enjoyment for this and future generations.

Environment
10
Waukesha County Community Foundation

Wccf is a pool of permanent endowment and project funds created primarily by and for the people of waukesha county to provide grant support to charitable organizations. the intent of the foundation is to serve a broad spectrum of the…

Philanthropy
11
Wisconsin School Counselor Association Inc

Our vision is for wisconsin to be the model for excellence in equitable school counseling practice, exemplified by the advocacy, leadership, and expertise of the members of the wsca.

12
Old World Wisconsin Foundation Inc

Enhance the well-being of old world wisconsin

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Homes of Oconomowoc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Adel B Korkor Md Foundation for Mental. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior Residential CareFood Pantries & AssistanceCommunity Health & Social S…Naples Arts & Culture Organ…Collier County Community Fo…Disability Employment Servi…Animal Shelter and Rescue S…Arts & Culture OrganizationsCommunity Hospital SystemsIndependent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr13%7%5–10yr18%22%10–20yr18%7%20–35yr14%33%35–55yr17%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%9%5–10yr18%15%10–20yr18%8%20–35yr14%28%35–55yr17%40%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
11%
1,185/10,433

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF OCONOMOWOC — $205,000 · OtherCITY OF OCONOMOWOCBoy Scouts of America — $185,000 · OtherBoy Scouts of AmericaOCONOMOWOC HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $100,000 · OtherOCONOMOWOC HISTORICAL SOCIETYOCONOMOWOC SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $92,000 · OtherOCONOMOWOC SCHOLARSHIP FUNDFriends Oconomowoc Parks and Trails — $75,000 · OtherOconomowoc Parks and Trails — $70,000 · OtherFisher House of WI — $60,000 · OtherOCONOMOWOC AREA FOOD PANTRY — $56,000 · OtherLAKE AREA FREE DENTAL CLINIC — $50,000 · Other+38 more — $521,200 · Other+38 moreGLACIAL COMMUNITY YMCA INC — $220,000 · Human ServicesGLACIAL COMMUNIT…LUTHERAN HOMES OF OCONOMOWOC INC — $33,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN HOMES O…ZACHARIAH'S ACRES INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesZACHARIAH'S ACRE…THE WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S CENT…LAKE AREA FREE CLINIC INC — $80,000 · HealthLAKE AREA F…Froedtert Hospital Foundation Inc — $70,000 · HealthFroedtert H…FISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN INC — $50,000 · HealthFISHER HOUS…American Heart Association Inc — $25,000 · HealthAmerican He…DISCOVERY WORLD LTD — $40,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY LAKE SCHOOL INC — $12,500 · EducationNAPLES YACHT CLUB BLUE GAVEL SCHOLARSHIP SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $2,000 · EducationWISCONSIN VFW FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · Public BenefitHISTORIC WEST BEND THEATRE INC — $30,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PRESERVATION ALLIANCE — $10,000 · Arts & CultureARTSTART INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureADEL B KORKOR MD FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL — $20,000 · PhilanthropyFORT ATKINSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,414,200Human Services$313,000Health$225,000Education$54,500Public Benefit$50,000Arts & Culture$45,000Philanthropy$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGLACIAL COMMUNITY YMCA INC — $220,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetOCONOMOWOC HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $100,000 over 8y, 35% of budgetOCONOMOWOC SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $92,000 over 8y, 8.8% of budgetLAKE AREA FREE CLINIC INC — $80,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetFroedtert Hospital Foundation Inc — $70,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetFISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN INC — $50,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetWISCONSIN VFW FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetOCONOMOWOC AREA SENIOR CENTER INC — $45,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetDISCOVERY WORLD LTD — $40,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN HOMES OF OCONOMOWOC INC — $33,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOconomowoc Food Pantry Inc — $30,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetZACHARIAH'S ACRES INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetHISTORIC WEST BEND THEATRE INC — $30,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetST JOHN'S NORTHWESTERN ACADEMIES — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association at Pabst Farms Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetADEL B KORKOR MD FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL — $20,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWashington Area Bicyclist Association — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFORT ATKINSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY LAKE SCHOOL INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE PRESERVATION ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetEaster Seals Southeast Wisconsin Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTSTART INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNAPLES HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNAPLES YACHT CLUB BLUE GAVEL SCHOLARSHIP SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLACIAL COMMUNITY YMCA INC
  • Who funds OCONOMOWOC HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds OCONOMOWOC SCHOLARSHIP FUND
  • Who funds LAKE AREA FREE CLINIC INC
  • Who funds Froedtert Hospital Foundation Inc
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds WISCONSIN VFW FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OCONOMOWOC AREA SENIOR CENTER INC
  • Who funds DISCOVERY WORLD LTD
  • Who funds LUTHERAN HOMES OF OCONOMOWOC INC
  • Who funds Oconomowoc Food Pantry Inc
  • Who funds ZACHARIAH'S ACRES INC
  • Who funds HISTORIC WEST BEND THEATRE INC
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER INC
  • Who funds ST JOHN'S NORTHWESTERN ACADEMIES
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds Young Mens Christian Association at Pabst Farms Inc
  • Who funds ADEL B KORKOR MD FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL
  • Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Washington Area Bicyclist Association
  • Who funds HUMANE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF WAUKESHA COUNTY INC
  • Who funds FORT ATKINSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY LAKE SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PRESERVATION ALLIANCE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oconomowoc Area Foundation IncWI26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oconomowoc Area Foundation Inc · Waukesha County Community Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Emil Ewald Family Foundation Inc · Theodore W Batterman Family Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Roehl Foundation Inc · STACKNER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC co KRISTIN A OCCHETTI · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Debbink Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph