Skip to content
Dearborn Community Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Dearborn Community Center

Promote religious, educational, charitable, cultural and other activitis in the best tradition of Islam, promote friendly relations between muslims and non-muslims and non-muslims, promote, accept and respect the rules, regulations, and constitution of USA.

$414k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$1.1MReligion$653kPublic Safety & Disaster$154kYouth Development$49kHuman Services$32kEducation$27kCivil Rights$21kHealth$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $311,795, the rows itemized in this filing. The $414,257 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $102,462 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $215k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$11,882
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Rahma Worldide relief$55,682
Life for Relief & develpment$35,888
Mercy USA$28,380
Mercy Without Limits$21,280
North Austin Muslim Community$20,745
World Peace Association$19,592
Pure Hands Inc$17,353
Community Acitivty Center$14,631
Bentonvile Islamic center$12,417
Islamic center of Round rock$11,882
American Moslem Bekaa Center$11,190
Spring Educational Foundation$11,100
Alhadaya Academy$10,240
Muslim Aid USA$8,738
DFW Islamic Education Center$8,140
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Dar Alsalam Enterprise: $6k → 21%UNITED HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION: $7k → 21%World Peace Association: $20k → 21%World Peace Association Masjid al: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
NE
VA
KS
AR
DC
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 26 repeat orgs$533k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
45

Total granted

$1.6M
$460k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+32%

Still filing today

54%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MERCY-USA FOR AID & DEVELOPMENTINC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $282k · revenue +68%
  • LF
    LIFE FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $213k · revenue +342%
  • MW
    Mercy Without Limits
    4× · 2022–2025 · $80k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • IR
    ISLAMIC RELIEF USA
    2× · 2021–2022 · $33k · revenue +8%
  • WP
    World Peace Association
    one grant, 2022 · $26k
  • IC
    ISLAMIC CENTER OF HAWTHORNE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $23k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Islamic Ummah Relief Corp

Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans

Human Services
2
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
3
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
4
Muslim Response Usa for Relief and Development

To provide material and financial assistance to relieve the sufferings of any and all persons affected by disasters. conflicts, disease. and hunger, irrespective of race. creed or ethnicity. To support schools and other learning centers…

International
5
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
6
Wisdom Islamic Studies and Education Inc
Religion
7
Muslim Welfare Association

Carry out charitable initiatives that provide essential support and basic necessities to those in need.

Philanthropy
8
International Institute of Islamic Medicine

International Institute of Islamic Medicine (IIIM) acquires and disseminates knowledge of the rich history of Islamic medicine and fosters its contemporary application

Human Services
9
American Muslim Instituition

Human Rights Project

Arts & Culture
10
Islamic Association of texas Inc

Provide a peaceful place of prayer for the local community and helping those in need with human essentials.

Religion
11
Tvislaamaa

To spread islamic values to the globe through media

Arts & Culture
12
Alsajdah Foundation
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy-Usa for Aid & Developmentinc; the most unlike its peers is Alkitab Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
20/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rahma Relief Foundation: $148,025 · OtherRahma Relief FoundationTHE ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF BREVARD COUNTY INC: $105,395 · OtherTHE ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF BREVARD COUNTY INCIslamic Relief USA: $64,857 · OtherIslamic Relief USAISLAMIC CENTER OF HAMTRAMCK: $58,250 · OtherISLAMIC CENTER OF HAMTRAMCKNORTH AUSTIN MUSLIM COMMUNITY CENTER: $56,780 · OtherNORTH AUSTIN MUSLIM COMMUNITY CENTER+46 more: $542,711 · Other+46 moreMERCY-USA FOR AID & DEVELOPMENTINC: $281,911 · InternationalMERCY-USA FOR AID & DEVELOPMENTINCLIFE FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $213,341 · InternationalLIFE FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INCRAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENT: $148,962 · InternationalRAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENTMercy Without Limits: $79,535 · InternationalMercy Without LimitsPURE HANDS INC: $34,313 · InternationalISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $32,591 · International+5 more: $39,469 · InternationalAmerican Moslem Bekka Center: $47,358 · ReligionCOUNCIL OF ISLAMIC ORGANIZATION: $21,396 · ReligionSachse Muslim Society: $19,961 · ReligionDarul Wahi: $18,280 · ReligionAMERICAN IMAM ACADEMY: $13,200 · ReligionALKITAB FOUNDATION: $7,200 · ReligionISLAM BY TOUCH INC: $5,496 · ReligionMUSLIM AID AMERICA: $41,288 · Public Safety & DisasterUnited Mission For Relief & Development: $27,200 · Public Safety & DisasterSANAD RELIEF INC: $53,298 · EducationSpring Educational Foundation: $11,100 · EducationJ and E Community Relief Inc: $49,056 · Youth DevelopmentWORLD PEACE ASSOCIATION: $24,592 · Human ServicesUNITED HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION: $7,091 · Human ServicesSALAM SPACE ORGANIZATION: $6,000 · Human ServicesIsaad foundation: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$976,018International$830,122Religion$132,891Public Safety & Disaster$68,488Education$64,398Youth Development$49,056Human Services$37,683Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMERCY-USA FOR AID & DEVELOPMENTINC: $281,911 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetLIFE FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $213,341 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetRAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENT: $148,962 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMercy Without Limits: $79,535 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSANAD RELIEF INC: $53,298 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetJ and E Community Relief Inc: $49,056 over 3y, 40% of budgetAmerican Moslem Bekka Center: $47,358 over 4y, 10% of budgetMUSLIM AID AMERICA: $41,288 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPURE HANDS INC: $34,313 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $32,591 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Mission For Relief & Development: $27,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD PEACE ASSOCIATION: $24,592 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCOUNCIL OF ISLAMIC ORGANIZATION: $21,396 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetSachse Muslim Society: $19,961 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDarul Wahi: $18,280 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetAMERICAN IMAM ACADEMY: $13,200 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CALL ORGANIZATION INC: $10,577 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSUNRISE USA INC: $9,230 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIslamic Services Foundation: $7,166 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAITULMAAL INC: $7,132 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION: $7,091 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Hands Relief Inc: $5,530 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISLAM BY TOUCH INC: $5,496 over 2y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MERCY-USA FOR AID & DEVELOPMENTINC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds RAHMA WORLDWIDE AID AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Without Limits ↗
  • Who funds SANAD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds J and E Community Relief Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Moslem Bekka Center ↗
  • Who funds MUSLIM AID AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds PURE HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
  • Who funds United Mission For Relief & Development ↗
  • Who funds WORLD PEACE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL OF ISLAMIC ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds Sachse Muslim Society ↗
  • Who funds Darul Wahi ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN IMAM ACADEMY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Tabbaa FoundationAmerican Muslim Commu…Sattar Family Foundat…The Syed FoundationThe Kashlan FoundationNoor Munshi FoundationThe Fountain of Knowl…Amin & Rubina Chikhal…The Arif FoundationTexas Instruments Fou…The Premier Medical F…United Hands Relief I…
The Tabbaa FoundationMI34.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Tabbaa Foundation · American Muslim Community Foundation · Sattar Family Foundation · The Syed Foundation · The Kashlan Foundation · Noor Munshi Foundation · The Fountain of Knowledg Foundation · Amin & Rubina Chikhalia Foundation · The Arif Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Premier Medical Foundation · United Hands Relief Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dearborn Community Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dearborn Community Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dearborn Community Center?

    Find your warmest path to Dearborn Community Center through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dearborn Community Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home