Skip to content

· Private foundation

David Tyson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$70kEducation$22kAnimals$8kHuman Services$3kHousing & Shelter$750Arts & Culture$157
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$167k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEDICAL MISSION SISTERS$2,000
PROJECT HOPE$2,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$2,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY KENYA PROGRAM$2,000
ESPA USA FOUNDATION$1,500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHENS$1,500
MERCY CORPS$1,000
FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE$541
THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER$500
ASPCA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $672 → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $600 → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $541 → 7%FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE: $500 → 7%COVENANT HOUSE: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
IA
IN
PA
CA
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$101k · 13 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
6

Total granted

$101k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+2%

Still filing today

54%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalAnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +85%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +98%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $3k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • EU
    ESPA USA ADDL JUNE 2022
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF PECONIC INC
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • CU
    CARE USA
    one grant, 2023 · $380
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
3
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
4
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
5
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
6
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
7
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
8
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
9
Humane World for Animals Inc

Humane World for Animals, Inc., formerly known as the Humane Society of the United States (The Organization), seeks to tackle the root causes of animal cruelty and suffering. CONTINUED ON SCHEDULE O

Animals
10
National Geographic Society

To increase and diffuse geographic knowledge in the broadest sense, using the power of science, exploration, education and storytelling to illuminate and protect the wonder of the world.

Education
11
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
12
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Corps; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Elephant Seal. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEDICAL MISSION SISTERS: $18,215 · OtherMEDICAL MISSION SISTERSINDIANA UNIVERSITY KENYA PROGRAM: $17,500 · OtherINDIANA UNIVERSITY KENYA PROGRAMESPA USA FOUNDATION: $8,500 · OtherESPA USA FOUNDATIONMARYMOUNT SCHOOL OF NEW YORK: $2,330 · OtherLOYOLA SCHOOL: $2,251 · Other+4 more: $2,930 · Other+4 morePROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $19,215 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FO…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $19,215 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,250 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $3,139 · AnimalsTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $2,800 · AnimalsFriends of the Elephant Seal: $2,300 · AnimalsFAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $2,313 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $250 · Human ServicesSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY: $300 · EducationROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC: $157 · Arts & Culture
Other$51,726International$41,680Animals$8,239Human Services$2,563Education$300Arts & Culture$157

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $19,215 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $19,215 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $3,139 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $2,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $2,313 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Elephant Seal: $2,300 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF PECONIC INC: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC: $157 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Elephant Seal ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF PECONIC INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David Tyson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David Tyson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David Tyson’s filings →

More from the funding graph