Skip to content

· Private foundation

David J Beyda Memorial Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$740kPhilanthropy$493kReligion$465kHealth$198kEducation$167kYouth Development$103kInternational$57kCommunity Improvement$15kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,718
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEYDA FAMILY FUND (DAF)$2,718
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $598k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HELPING HEARTS FOUNDATION: $800 → 12%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIKVOT: $501 → 9%THE SPECIAL CHILDRENS CENTER: $9k → 11%CHAI 4 EVER: $1k → 11%CARE FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $4k → 17%DEBORAH SALEM FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%BONEI OLAM: $7k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $2k → 20%A TIME: $501 → 20%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $3k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $160k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $156k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $105k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $68k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $33k → 20%SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK: $28k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $20k → 20%DEBORAH SALEM FOUNDATION: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 46 repeat orgs$621k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 46 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
84

Total granted

$1.6M
$618k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+20%

Still filing today

43%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesEducationReligionHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $568k · revenue +82%
  • SC
    SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY ALLIANCE
    4× · 2018–2021 · $83k · revenue +4%
  • SF
    SAFE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $79k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • SF
    SBH FUND IN MEMORY OF JD BEYDA
    one grant, 2017 · $170k
  • H
    HATZOLOH
    one grant, 2017 · $80k
  • S
    SCAILEAD
    one grant, 2017 · $36k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
5
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
6
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
7
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
8
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
9
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
10
University of Judaism Foundation
—
11
Zicron Eliyahu Inc
—
12
Bais Yisrael Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sephardic Community Alliance; the most unlike its peers is Sephardic Heritage Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 133 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/56
Grantees still filing
38/56
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SBH FUND IN MEMORY OF JD BEYDA: $170,000 · OtherSBH FUND IN MEMORY OF JD BEYDASEPHARDIC RABBINCAL COLLEGE: $88,000 · OtherSEPHARDIC RABBINCAL COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient: $83,010 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHATZOLOH: $80,000 · OtherHATZOLOHSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $78,700 · OtherSAFE FOUNDATION INCSCAILEAD: $36,000 · Other+84 more: $535,869 · Other+84 moreSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $568,069 · Human ServicesSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK …+9 more: $29,802 · Human ServicesSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $149,152 · Youth DevelopmentSEPHARDIC CO…ILEAD EXPERIENCE INC: $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentILEAD EXPERI…+1 more: $2,806 · Youth DevelopmentBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $64,901 · EducationILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $24,800 · EducationAmerican Friends of EshelInc: $15,000 · EducationSEPHARDIC ACADEMY OF MANHATTAN INC: $14,400 · EducationTHE YALDEINU SCHOOL: $5,487 · EducationSEPHARDIC FOUNDATION FOR TORAH STUDIES INC: $5,400 · Education+4 more: $7,604 · EducationSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $82,801 · ReligionSEPHARDIC INSTITUTE SEPHARDIC INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEARNING: $9,540 · ReligionEILAT CHARITIES INC: $6,250 · ReligionMAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA: $5,200 · Religion+3 more: $7,560 · ReligionCHAI LIFELINE INC: $22,000 · HealthCMC FOUNDATION FOR CHANGE: $10,000 · HealthFeinstein Health Fund Inc: $8,000 · HealthNew York Cancer Center Inc: $7,196 · HealthMAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER: $6,250 · HealthNew York Cancer Foundation: $5,200 · Health+1 more: $152 · HealthINNOVATION AFRICA: $25,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $6,400 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $5,000 · International+3 more: $1,753 · International
Other$1,071,579Human Services$597,871Youth Development$241,958Education$137,592Religion$111,351Health$58,798International$38,153

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $568,069 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $149,152 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetILEAD EXPERIENCE INC: $90,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $82,801 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $78,700 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $64,901 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SEPHARDIC STUDIES: $28,710 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetINNOVATION AFRICA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $24,800 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $22,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of EshelInc: $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetEXCEED NETWORK: $14,800 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetSEPHARDIC ACADEMY OF MANHATTAN INC: $14,400 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $12,853 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $10,200 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCMC FOUNDATION FOR CHANGE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSEPHARDIC INSTITUTE SEPHARDIC INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEARNING: $9,540 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFeinstein Health Fund Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNew York Cancer Center Inc: $7,196 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $6,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEILAT CHARITIES INC: $6,250 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetMAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER: $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YALDEINU SCHOOL: $5,487 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEPHARDIC FOUNDATION FOR TORAH STUDIES INC: $5,400 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA: $5,200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNew York Cancer Foundation: $5,200 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEPHARDIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $4,880 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCARE FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetREACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER: $3,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEV ECHAD INC: $3,600 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $2,806 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDEBORAH SALEM FOUNDATION: $2,800 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetMITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $2,800 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPROPEL NETWORK INC: $2,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALGEMEINER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIDNEY & UROLOGY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBLINK CPR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHAI 4EVER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetICE HOCKEY IN HARLEM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHELPING HEARTS FOUNDATION: $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $504 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIKVOT INC CO ARMEL LESLIE: $501 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YIRGUN YRA: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ILEAD EXPERIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds SAFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BARKAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR SEPHARDIC STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds INNOVATION AFRICA ↗
  • Who funds ILAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of EshelInc ↗
  • Who funds EXCEED NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC ACADEMY OF MANHATTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CMC FOUNDATION FOR CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC INSTITUTE SEPHARDIC INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Feinstein Health Fund Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY61.1× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · I Chera & Sons Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · E R G Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Chehebar Family Foundation · Samuel & Mollie Jemal Foundation Co Jem Realty · The Setton Foundation · Haddad Brands Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David J Beyda Memorial Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David J Beyda Memorial Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
  • Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David J Beyda Memorial Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to David J Beyda Memorial Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 133 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David J Beyda Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph