· Private foundation
Daughters of the Cincinnati
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FBO TESS SANFORD | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FBO MAYA DESAI | $5,000 |
| PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY FBO MIREYA GALACGAC | $5,000 |
| NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY FBO ELLA JONES | $5,000 |
| STANFORD UNIVERSITY FBO SHAE DOLAN | $5,000 |
| NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FBO EMILY RICE | $5,000 |
| GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY FBO ANNABELLE BLACK | $5,000 |
| GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FBO ZOE SMITH | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA FBO MARTHA DWYER | $5,000 |
| GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FBO BROOKE CHAMBLISS | $4,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH FBO JACKLYN WYSZYNSKI | $4,000 |
| GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY FBO MARY PHLAUM | $4,000 |
| HOWARD UNIVERSITY FBO NIKKYA TALIAFERO | $4,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL FBO MADELYN COBLE | $4,000 |
| GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FBO KATHERINE MEEK | $4,000 |
Where the grant dollars land
Across the US and around the world.
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
48 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- IGIndividual grant recipient5× · 2018–2022 · $20k
- IGIndividual grant recipient5× · 2017–2021 · $20k
- IGIndividual grant recipient5× · 2017–2021 · $20k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $7k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $5k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Daughters of the Cincinnati?
Find your warmest path to Daughters of the Cincinnati through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Daughters of the Cincinnati’s filings →