Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dasankop Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
44
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

International$54kReligion$40kPhilanthropy$15kEducation$8kCommunity Improvement$6kCivil Rights$4kHealth$3kHuman Services$900Other$0
02FY2024 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k40 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $49k
$200
Median grant
15
States reached
$353k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DASANKOP FOUNDATION INDIA$15,476
DASANKOP FOUNDATION INDIA$12,000
DASANKOP FOUNDATION INDIA$11,894
Individual grant recipient$10,000
DASANKOP FOUNDATION INDIA$4,113
MUSLIM CHAMBER OF COMMERNCE$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
HIFZ ACADEMY$2,500
IMAC$1,000
FURQAAN ACADEMY$312
WORLD KASHMIR AWARENESS FORUM$300
Individual grant recipient$300
AHAD HYDERABAD ASSOCIATION$200
SIUT NORTH AMERICA$200
UNITED HAND RELIEF$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 64% of grant dollars ($108k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 36% that went abroad ($60k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Helping Hand for Relief Development: $300 → 8%HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF DEVELOPMENT: $200 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
NJ
CA
NE
VA
MD
AZ
KS
DC
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 36% of all-years giving ($60k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$60k · 7 grants
Switzerland$200 · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$108k · 40 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
51

Total granted

$108k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+45%

Still filing today

48%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthEducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BAITULMAAL INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +434%
  • IA
    Indian American Muslim Council
    2× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +18%
  • TZ
    THE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    4× · 2021–2024 · $800 · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • IS
    ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF TAMPA BAY AREA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $14k
  • IL
    ISTABA lslamic Society of Tampa Bay
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
2
Rahma Worldwide Aid and Development

Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.

International
3
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
Ummah Relief International

Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.

International
6
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
7
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
8
Irusa Waqf

Establish a pool of capital that ensures the long-term sustainability of irusa and enables the charity in achieving its objectives.

International
9
International Refugee Assistance Project Inc

Irap is a global legal aid and advocacy organization working to create a world where refugees and all people seeking safety are empowered to claim their right to freedom of movement and a path to lasting refuge. everyone should have a safe…

Human Services
10
Pure Hands Inc

Pure Hands, Inc.s mission is preservation of human lives by elimination of hunger through detection, prevention and treatment of malnutrition. Pure Hands, Inc. tackles the underlying causes of malnutrition and poverty during and after…

International
11
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
12
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Palestinian Appeal Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bayan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
28/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DASANKOP FOUNDATION INDIA: $60,047 · OtherDASANKOP FOUNDATION INDIAISLAMIC SOCIETY OF TAMPA BAY AREA INC: $14,100 · OtherISLAMIC SOCIETY OF TAMPA BAY AREA INCISTABA: $13,600 · OtherISTABAIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientISTABA lslamic Society of Tampa Bay: $9,500 · OtherISTABA lslamic Society of Tampa BayIndividual grant recipient: $9,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+78 more: $37,271 · Other+78 moreBAITULMAAL INC: $2,070 · InternationalISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $800 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $596 · InternationalPENNY APPEAL USA INC: $400 · InternationalUnited Hands Relief Inc: $300 · InternationalMercy Corps: $200 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNHCR: $200 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $200 · InternationalUNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC: $200 · International+2 more: $200 · InternationalSYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $650 · HealthSIUT NORTH AMERICA INC: $500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $400 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $400 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $150 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $100 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $100 · HealthIndian American Muslim Council: $1,595 · Arts & CultureCAIR FLORIDA INC: $700 · Civil RightsJUSTICE FOR ALL: $600 · Civil RightsHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $400 · Human ServicesThe University of Tampa Incorporated: $250 · EducationHELPING BLIND PEOPLE INC: $200 · EducationBAYAN: $200 · Education
Other$156,518International$5,166Health$2,300Arts & Culture$1,595Civil Rights$1,300Human Services$900Education$650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAITULMAAL INC: $2,070 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIndian American Muslim Council: $1,595 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAIR FLORIDA INC: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTICE FOR ALL: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $596 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSIUT NORTH AMERICA INC: $500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPENNY APPEAL USA INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Hands Relief Inc: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Tampa Incorporated: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSLIM CONNECTION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING BLIND PEOPLE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAYAN: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIOUS PROJECTS OF AMERICA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSLIM AID AMERICA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSAL ACADEMY OF FLORIDA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAHMA FOUNDATION USA: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAITULMAAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Indian American Muslim Council ↗
  • Who funds THE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
  • Who funds CAIR FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds SYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds SIUT NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HAND FOR RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amin & Rubina Chikhalia FoundationFL24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amin & Rubina Chikhalia Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Sidra Foundation · American Muslim Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Tabbaa Foundation · Darul Sadaqa786 · Sahara Foundation · Saif and Lubna Foundation · Islamic Relief USA · Verizon Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dasankop Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dasankop Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Universal Academy of Florida Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Florida Sheriffs Association Inc: 4% of income from government
  • The Muslim Connection Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The University of Tampa Incorporated: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 110 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dasankop Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph