Skip to content
Daniel G Hartman Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Daniel G Hartman Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$512k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$256k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$2.0MReligion$790kEducation$395kHealth$395kRecreation & Sports$390k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k5 grants · $256k
  • $250k+1 grant · $256k
$51,219
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY$256,098
BOYERTOWN LIONS COM AMB SVC$51,219
BOYERTOWN COMMUNITY LIBRARY$51,219
THE FRIENDSHIP HOOK & LADDER$51,219
ST JOHN'S EVANGELICAL CHURCH$51,219
GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH OF CHRIST$51,219
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $62k → 11%SALVATION ARMY: $312k → 14%BOYERTOWN LIONS COM AMB SVC: $62k → 11%SALVATION ARMY: $262k → 14%BOYERTOWN COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $62k → 11%SALVATION ARMY: $259k → 14%THE FRIENDSHIP HOOK & LADDER: $58k → 11%SALVATION ARMY: $256k → 14%THE FRIENDSHIP HOOK & LADDER: $52k → 11%SALVATION ARMY: $240k → 14%ST JOHN'S EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHUR: $52k → 11%SALVATION ARMY: $230k → 14%BOYERTOWN LIONS COM AMB SVC: $52k → 11%SALVATION ARMY: $226k → 14%GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $52k → 11%SALVATION ARMY: $188k → 14%BOYERTOWN COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $52k → 11%BOYERTOWN LIONS COM AMB SVC: $52k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $52k → 11%THE FRIENDSHIP HOOK & LADDER: $52k → 11%BOYERTOWN COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $52k → 11%ST JOHN'S EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHUR: $52k → 11%BOYERTOWN COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $51k → 11%BOYERTOWN LIONS COM AMB SVC: $51k → 11%THE FRIENDSHIP HOOK & LADDER: $51k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $51k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $48k → 11%BOYERTOWN LIONS COM AMB SVC: $48k → 11%BOYERTOWN COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $48k → 11%THE FRIENDSHIP HOOK & LADDER: $48k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $46k → 11%BOYERTOWN COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $46k → 11%THE FRIENDSHIP HOOK & LADDER: $46k → 11%BOYERTOWN LIONS COM AMB SVC: $46k → 11%ST JOHN'S EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHUR: $45k → 11%THE FRIENDSHIP HOOK & LADDER: $45k → 11%BOYERTOWN LIONS COM AMB SVC: $45k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $45k → 11%BOYERTOWN COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $45k → 11%BOYERTOWN COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $38k → 11%BOYERTOWN LIONS COM AMB SVC: $38k → 11%THE FRIENDSHIP HOOK & LADDER: $38k → 11%ST JOHN'S EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHUR: $38k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $38k → 11%ST JOHN'S EVANGELICAL CHURCH: $62k → 11%ST JOHN'S EVANGELICAL CHURCH: $51k → 11%ST JOHN'S EVANGELICAL CHURCH: $48k → 11%ST JOHN'S EVANGELICAL CHURCH: $46k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 7 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
0

Total granted

$3.9M
$0

Still filing today

43%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BL
    BOYERTOWN LIONS COMMUNITY AMBULANCE SERVICE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $395k · revenue +173%
  • BC
    BOYERTOWN COMMUNITY LIBRARY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $395k · revenue +63%
  • FH
    FRIENDSHIP HOOK & LADDER CO #1 INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $390k · revenue +84%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    3/3
    Grantees still filing
    3/3
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    THE SALVATION ARMY: $1,973,781 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYGOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH OF CHRIST: $394,755 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH OF CHRISTBOYERTOWN COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $394,755 · OtherBOYERTOWN COMMUNITY LIBRARYST JOHN'S EVANGELICAL CHURCH: $207,735 · OtherST JOHN'S EVANGELICAL CHURCHST JOHNS EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $187,020 · OtherST JOHNS EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCHBOYERTOWN LIONS COMMUNITY AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $394,755 · HealthBOYERTOWN L…FRIENDSHIP HOOK & LADDER CO #1 INC: $389,953 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDSHIP …
    Other$3,158,046Health$394,755Recreation & Sports$389,953

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYERTOWN LIONS COMMUNITY AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $394,755 over 8y, 6.1% of budgetBOYERTOWN COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $394,755 over 8y, 15% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOOK & LADDER CO #1 INC: $389,953 over 8y, 16% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds BOYERTOWN LIONS COMMUNITY AMBULANCE SERVICE INC ↗
    • Who funds BOYERTOWN COMMUNITY LIBRARY ↗
    • Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOOK & LADDER CO #1 INC ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Daniel G Hartman Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Daniel G Hartman Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Daniel G Hartman’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home