Skip to content

· Private foundation

Daniel and Ingrid Jones Fam Fndn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$300k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
0160% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$394kPhilanthropy$263kArts & Culture$131kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $240k
$60,014
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HERITAGE HUMANE SOCIETY$90,020
Individual grant recipient$90,020
WILLIAMSBURG COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$60,014
Individual grant recipient$30,007
VIRGINIA SYMPHONY$30,007
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 44% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%HERITAGE HUMANE SOCIETY: $96k → 7%WHRO TV: $96k → 19%HERITAGE HUMANE SOCIETY: $90k → 7%WHRO TV: $90k → 19%HERITAGE HUMANE SOCIETY: $88k → 7%WHRO TV: $88k → 19%HERITAGE HUMANE SOCIETY: $78k → 7%WHRO TV: $78k → 19%WILLIAMSBURG COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $64k → 7%WHRO TV: $41k → 19%WILLIAMSBURG COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $60k → 7%VIRGINIA SYMPHONY CHARITABLE: $32k → 19%WILLIAMSBURG COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $59k → 7%VIRGINIA SYMPHONY: $30k → 19%WILLIAMSBURG COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $52k → 7%VIRGINIA SYMPHONY CHARITABLE: $29k → 19%HERITAGE HUMANE SOCIETY: $41k → 7%VIRGINIA SYMPHONY FOUNDATION: $26k → 19%WILLIAMSBURG COMMUNITY TRUST: $28k → 7%VIRGINIA SYMPHONY: $14k → 19%HERITAGE HUMANE SOCIETY: $111 → 7%VIRGINIA SYMPHONY: $37 → 19%WILLIAMSBURG COMMUNITY TRUST: $74 → 7%WHRO TV: $111 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 6 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against -87% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
1

Total granted

$1.1M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-87%

Still filing today

33%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2020–2025 · $394k
  • HH
    HERITAGE HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $394k · revenue +10%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2020–2025 · $131k

Funded once

  • VS
    VIRGINIA SYMPHONY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $26k · revenue -87%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $394,392 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $131,465 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVIRGINIA SYMPHONY CHARITABLE: $61,474 · OtherVIRGINIA SYMPHONY CHARITABLEWILLIAMSBURG COMMUNITY TRUST: $27,702 · OtherVIRGINIA SYMPHONY FOUNDATION: $26,133 · OtherHERITAGE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $394,392 · AnimalsHERITAGE HUMANE SOCIETY INCGREATER WILLIAMSBURG COMMUNITY TRUST: $235,226 · PhilanthropyGREATER WILLIAMSBURG…VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $43,858 · Arts & Culture
Other$641,166Animals$394,392Philanthropy$235,226Arts & Culture$43,858

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHERITAGE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $394,392 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetGREATER WILLIAMSBURG COMMUNITY TRUST: $235,226 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetVIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $43,858 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetVIRGINIA SYMPHONY FOUNDATION: $26,133 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HERITAGE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WILLIAMSBURG COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA SYMPHONY FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Daniel and Ingrid Jones Fam Fndn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Daniel and Ingrid Jones Fam Fndn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Daniel and Ingrid Jones Fam Fndn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph