Skip to content
Damien-Dutton Society for Leprosy Aid Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Damien-Dutton Society for Leprosy Aid Inc

Provide funds for leprosy patients

$3.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.4MInternational$740kHealth$585kArts & Culture$300kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $2,000,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,210,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,210,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$400,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$131k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SACRED HEART FATHERS$400,000
DIVINE WORD MINISTRIES$400,000
Medical Mission of Mary$400,000
DAMIEN HOUSE$400,000
MORE$400,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 53% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%Medical Mission of Mary: $400k → 8%SACRED HEART FATHERS: $400k → 11%THE JOSEPH DUTTON GUILD: $100k → 9%Daughters of WISDOM PROVINCIAL HOUSE: $80k → 7%Catholic Medical Mission Bd: $80k → 13%IDEA: $10k → 14%AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS: $15k → 10%MORE: $400k → 8%Daughters of Charity ST VINCENT: $80k → 8%DAMIEN HOUSE: $400k → 14%Medical Mission of Mary: $80k → 8%SACRED HEART FATHERS: $80k → 11%THE JOSEPH DUTTON GUILD: $100k → 9%Daughters of WISDOM PROVINCIAL HOUSE: $75k → 7%Catholic Medical Mission Bd: $75k → 13%IDEA: $10k → 14%AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS: $15k → 10%MORE: $80k → 8%Daughters of Charity ST VINCENT: $75k → 8%DAMIEN HOUSE: $80k → 14%Medical Mission of Mary: $75k → 8%SACRED HEART FATHERS: $75k → 11%THE JOSEPH DUTTON GUILD: $100k → 9%IDEA: $10k → 14%MORE: $75k → 8%DAMIEN HOUSE: $75k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$3.6M
$0

Still filing today

45%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
InternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DH
    DAMIEN HOUSE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $555k · revenue +14% · 47% of their budget
  • EW
    ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $155k · revenue +41%
  • IA
    INTERNATIONAL ASSN FOR INTEGRATION DIGNITY AND ECONOMIC ADVNCMNT INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $30k · revenue +17%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    5/5
    Grantees still filing
    4/5
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Medical Mission of Mary: $555,000 · OtherMedical Mission of MaryDIVINE WORD MINISTRIES: $555,000 · OtherDIVINE WORD MINISTRIESDIVINE WORD MISIONARIES PROVINCIAL OFFICE: $555,000 · OtherDIVINE WORD MISIONARIES PROVINCIAL OFFICETHE CONGREGATION OF THE SACRED HEART: $555,000 · OtherTHE CONGREGATION OF THE SACRED HEARTJOSEPH DUTTON GUILD: $300,000 · OtherJOSEPH DUTTON GUILDDAUGHTERS OF CHARITY INC: $155,000 · OtherDAUGHTERS OF CHARITY INCDAMIEN HOUSE INC: $555,000 · InternationalDAMIEN HOUSE INCCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $155,000 · InternationalCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION…INTERNATIONAL ASSN FOR INTEGRATION DIGNITY AND ECONOMIC ADVNCMNT INC: $30,000 · InternationalAMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC: $30,000 · InternationalETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $155,000 · Religion
    Other$2,675,000International$770,000Religion$155,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDAMIEN HOUSE INC: $555,000 over 3y, 47% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $155,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $155,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ASSN FOR INTEGRATION DIGNITY AND ECONOMIC ADVNCMNT INC: $30,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetAMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds DAMIEN HOUSE INC ↗
    • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
    • Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC ↗
    • Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSN FOR INTEGRATION DIGNITY AND ECONOMIC ADVNCMNT INC ↗
    • Who funds AMERICAN LEPROSY MISSIONS INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

    Fidelity Investments …
    Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Damien-Dutton Society for Leprosy Aid Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Damien-Dutton Society for Leprosy Aid Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Damien-Dutton Society for Leprosy Aid Inc?

      Find your warmest path to Damien-Dutton Society for Leprosy Aid Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Damien-Dutton Society for Leprosy Aid’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home