Skip to content

· Public charity

Dallas Rotary Club Foundation

Sponsors community service projects and scholarships.

$182k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$428kHuman Services$275kEducation$265kInternational$215kCommunity Improvement$132kPublic Safety & Disaster$103kFood & Nutrition$60kPublic Benefit$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $137,534, the rows itemized in this filing. The $182,204 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $44,670 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $132k
$14,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAFER DALLAS BETTER DALLAS$38,105
GEORGE W BUSH INSTITUTE MILITARY SERVICE INITIATIVE$36,500
DFW USO$22,500
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$14,000
TEXAS HEALTH RESOURCES$10,519
FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN$10,235
ROTARY CLUB OF MADISON COUNTY$5,675
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN: $10k → 7%NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $14k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $24k → 8%TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 10%TEXAS HEALTH RESOURCES: $11k → 11%GEORGE W BUSH INSTITUTE MILITARY SERVICE INITIATIVE: $37k → 13%SAFER DALLAS BETTER DALLAS: $67k → 14%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $8k → 22%US HUNGER: $10k → 11%COE COLLEGE: $8k → 9%ALBION COLLEGE: $8k → 14%ROTARY INTERNATIONAL PROJECT FUNDS: $97k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $16k → 8%TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 10%DFW USO: $84k → 11%GEORGE W BUSH INSTITUTE MILITARY SERVICE INITIATIVE: $30k → 13%SAFER DALLAS BETTER DALLAS: $66k → 14%US HUNGER: $10k → 11%COE COLLEGE: $8k → 9%ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $75k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $16k → 8%DALLASFT WORTH USO: $77k → 11%GEORGE W BUSH INSTITUTE MILITARY SERVICE INITIATIVE: $28k → 13%SAFER DALLAS BETTER DALLAS: $60k → 14%US HUNGER: $10k → 11%ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $53k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $16k → 8%DFW USO: $76k → 11%GEORGE W BUSH INSTITUTE MILITARY SERVICE INITIATIVE: $25k → 13%SAFER DALLAS BETTER DALLAS: $59k → 14%ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $48k → 14%DFW USO: $30k → 11%SAFER DALLAS BETTER DALLAS: $57k → 14%DFW USO: $28k → 11%SAFER DALLAS BETTER DALLAS: $46k → 14%DFW USO: $25k → 11%SAFER DALLAS BETTER DALLAS: $38k → 14%DFW USO: $23k → 11%SAFER DALLAS BETTER DALLAS: $35k → 14%DFW USO: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS: $12k → 14%DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $18k → 14%THE ROTARY CLUB OF DALLAS: $45k → 14%THE ROTARY CLUB OF DALLAS: $37k → 14%ROTARY CLUB OF DALLAS: $36k → 14%THE ROTARY CLUB OF DALLAS: $14k → 14%SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIR: $10k → 14%SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIR: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $43k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$43k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: ASSITANCE FOR GHANA DENTAL CLINICS

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Dallas Rotary Club Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Dallas Rotary Club Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 13 repeat orgs$300k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$1.3M
$273k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
-3%

Still filing today

46%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPublic Safety & DisasterPublic BenefitFood & NutritionHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    SAFER DALLAS BETTER DALLAS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $428k · revenue +312% · 41% of their budget
  • UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $105k · revenue +9%
  • FC
    Feeding Children Everywhere Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL PROJECT FUNDS
    one grant, 2018 · $97k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $77k
  • WR
    Waxahachie Rotary Club
    one grant, 2022 · $38k · revenue -3% · 33% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
2
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
3
Baylor University

The mission of baylor university is to educate men and women for worldwide leadership and service by integrating academic excellence and christian commitment within a caring community.

Education
4
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
5
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
6
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
7
Dallas Regional Chamber

Together, with our business leaders and community partners, we will help lead the dallas region to become the best place in the united states for all people to live, work, and do business.

—
8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
10
The Real Estate Council Inc

Trec's mission is to cultivate relationships in the commercial real estate industry to catalyze community investment, influence policy, propel careers and develop the leaders of tomorrow.we believe relationships are the lifeblood of career…

—
11
University of Dallas

The university of dallas is dedicated to the pursuit of wisdom, of truth, and of virtue as the proper and primary ends of education. the university seeks to educate its students so they may develop the intellectual and moral virtues,…

Education
12
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Coe College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $176,645 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONALIndividual grant recipient: $170,357 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRotary Club of Dallas: $131,911 · OtherRotary Club of DallasROTARY INTERNATIONAL PROJECT FUNDS: $96,951 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONAL PROJECT FUNDSIndividual grant recipient: $77,069 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS: $72,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXASGEORGE W BUSH INSTITUTE MILITARY SERVICE INITIATIVE: $55,000 · OtherGEORGE W BUSH INSTITUTE MILITARY SERVICE INITIATIVEWaxahachie Rotary Club: $38,297 · Other+10 more: $127,519 · Other+10 moreSAFER DALLAS BETTER DALLAS: $427,864 · Public Safety & DisasterSAFER DALLAS BETTER DALLASUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $105,000 · Public BenefitTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $64,000 · EducationCOE COLLEGE: $24,000 · EducationALBION COLLEGE: $16,000 · EducationFeeding Children Everywhere Inc: $29,550 · Food & NutritionTexas Health Resources: $10,519 · HealthFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $10,235 · International
Other$945,749Public Safety & Disaster$427,864Public Benefit$105,000Education$104,000Food & Nutrition$29,550Health$10,519International$10,235

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAFER DALLAS BETTER DALLAS: $427,864 over 8y, 41% of budgetRotary Club of Dallas: $131,911 over 4y, 21% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $105,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $64,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWaxahachie Rotary Club: $38,297 over 1y, 33% of budgetFeeding Children Everywhere Inc: $29,550 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOE COLLEGE: $24,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALBION COLLEGE: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $10,235 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAFER DALLAS BETTER DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds Rotary Club of Dallas ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Waxahachie Rotary Club ↗
  • Who funds Feeding Children Everywhere Inc ↗
  • Who funds COE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ALBION COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Texas Health Resources ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dallas Rotary Club Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dallas Rotary Club Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dallas Rotary Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph