Loading…
· Private foundation
DALE W AND ELIZABETH G BARGSTEN
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$120k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants
4
Communities
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2021
—
2023
conservation
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
02FY2023 · 11 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k7 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
- ABC HOUSE$50,158
- NATURE CONSERVANCY$25,000
- GREENBELT LAND TRUST$25,000
- EAGLE BLUFF LEARNING CENTER$10,000
- FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH$3,000
- BENTON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,000
- FISH OF ALBANY$2,000
- STOVE TEAM INTERNATIONAL$1,000
- PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,000
- OREGON PARKS FOREVER$500
- AUDUBON SOCIETY OF CORVALLIS$500
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Bessemer Giving FundNJ13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Bessemer Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation DALE W AND ELIZABETH G BARGSTEN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Dale W and Elizabeth G Bargsten?
Find your warmest path to Dale W and Elizabeth G Bargsten through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines