Skip to content

· Private foundation

D M Robb Private Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$135k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$475kReligion$241kAnimals$195kHuman Services$40kHealth$20kYouth Development$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $122k
$15,621
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$32,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY$25,000
FRIENDS OF ELECTRA PUBLIC LIBRARY$23,680
MIDWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FBO TER$15,621
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY FBO AUSTIN CA$14,479
MIDWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FBO RYL$11,563
MIDWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FBO NIC$7,763
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS - NATALIE HOLLIS: $23k → 8%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY: $30k → 11%TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY - KAYLA CRYER: $18k → 13%ANGELO STATE UNIVESITY - BRYCE RICH: $15k → 13%UNITED REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $20k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS - NATALIE HOLLIS: $13k → 8%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY: $30k → 11%TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY - KAYLA CRYER: $11k → 13%ANGELO STATE UNIVESITY - BRYCE RICH: $11k → 13%UNITED REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $20k → 8%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY: $25k → 11%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF ELECTRA: $40k → 16%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $15k → 8%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY: $20k → 11%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF ELECTRA: $37k → 16%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $10k → 8%HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY: $20k → 11%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $32k → 16%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF ELECTRA: $32k → 16%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $32k → 16%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $32k → 16%FRIENDS OF ELECTRA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $24k → 16%FRIENDS OF ELECTRA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $21k → 16%FRIENDS OF ELECTRA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $20k → 16%FRIENDS OF ELECTRA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $20k → 16%SENIOR CITIZENS OF ELECTRA: $20k → 16%SENIOR CITIZENS OF ELECTRA: $20k → 16%FRIENDS OF ELECTRA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $18k → 16%FRIENDS OF ELECTRA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $18k → 16%FRIENDS OF ELECTRA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $15k → 16%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF ELECTRA: $12k → 16%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF ELECTRA - MONTHLY GRANT AWARD: $12k → 16%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF ELECTRA: $12k → 16%ELECTRA POLICE DEPARTMENT: $11k → 16%ELECTRA FIRE DEPARTMENT: $11k → 16%FRIENDS OF ELECTRA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $10k → 16%ELECTRA FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10k → 16%ELECTRA FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10k → 16%ELECTRA FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10k → 16%ELECTRA POLICE DEPARTMENT: $10k → 16%ELECTRA POLICE DEPARTMENT: $10k → 16%MIDWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FBO TER: $16k → 16%MIDWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FBO TER: $16k → 16%MIDWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FBO RYL: $13k → 16%MIDWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FBO TER: $12k → 16%MIDWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FBO RYL: $12k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 20 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
6

Total granted

$1.0M
$34k

Still filing today

10%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ELECTRA PUBLIC LIBRARY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $153k
  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF ELECTRA
    5× · 2018–2022 · $133k
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY
    5× · 2018–2025 · $125k · revenue -71%

Funded once

  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF ELECTRA - MONTHLY GRANT AWARD
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
  • TS
    TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY - TYLER STALEY
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FBO NATAL
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
1/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF ELECTRA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $152,680 · OtherFRIENDS OF ELECTRA PUBLIC LIBRARYFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF ELECTRA: $132,500 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF ELECTRAFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $96,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $50,996 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY FBO AUSTIN CA: $48,126 · OtherTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY FBO AUSTIN CAMIDWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FBO TER: $43,443 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS - NATALIE HOLLIS: $43,245 · OtherSENIOR CITIZENS OF ELECTRA: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $35,993 · OtherMIDWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY - HANNAH DANIEL: $35,611 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,996 · Other+14 more: $168,103 · Other+14 moreHUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY: $125,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF WI…BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $70,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL …
Other$877,693Animals$195,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY: $125,000 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $70,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF WICHITA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization D M Robb Private Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from D M Robb Private Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on D M Robb Private’s filings →

    More from the funding graph