Skip to content
D D Hachar Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

D D Hachar Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$622k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$223k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.3MYouth Development$355kHealth$300kArts & Culture$201kCommunity Improvement$161kCrime & Legal$85kHuman Services$58kFood & Nutrition$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $473k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY$222,742
Laredo College Education Foundation$100,000
RUTHE B COWL REHABILITATION CENTER$50,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAREDO$50,000
Communities in Schools Laredo Inc$50,000
Laredo Theater Guild International$42,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH TEXAS$25,000
Casa De Misericordia$20,000
MAKE-A-WASH CENTRAL AND SOUTH$15,000
STREETS OF LAREDO MALL INC$15,000
IMAGINARIUM OF SOUTH TEXAS$12,500
THE LAREDO DIPLOMA PLUS FOUNDATION INC$10,000
Harmony Public Schools$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%UNIVERSITY OF INCARNATE WORD: $50k → 16%SCHOLARSHIPS (DETAIL AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST): $66k → 21%GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER SOUTH TEX: $15k → 27%UNIVERSITY OF INCARNATE WORD: $49k → 16%SCHOLARSHIPS (DETAIL AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST): $56k → 21%MAKE-A-WASH CENTRAL AND SOUTH: $15k → 16%SCHOLARSHIPS (DETAIL AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST): $48k → 21%MAKE-A-WASH CENTRAL AND SOUTH: $15k → 16%Laredo Theater Guild International: $42k → 21%Laredo Theater Guild International: $40k → 21%BORDER OLYMPICS INC: $35k → 21%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH TEXAS: $25k → 16%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH TEXAS: $13k → 16%TEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $345k → 21%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH TEXAS: $13k → 16%TEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $225k → 21%TEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $223k → 21%TEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $218k → 21%TEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $200k → 21%Laredo College Education Foundation: $140k → 21%Laredo College Education Foundation: $100k → 21%TEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $75k → 21%Communities in Schools Laredo Inc: $60k → 21%Communities in Schools Laredo Inc: $50k → 21%LAREDO THEATER GUILD INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 21%IMAGINARIUM OF SOUTH TEXAS: $20k → 21%IMAGINARIUM OF SOUTH TEXAS: $15k → 21%SOUTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $15k → 21%IMAGINARIUM OF SOUTH TEXAS: $15k → 21%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF LAREDO: $13k → 21%L C EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $150k → 21%LAREDO COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $100k → 21%LAREDO COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $100k → 21%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF LAREDO: $75k → 21%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF LAREDO: $75k → 21%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAREDO: $75k → 21%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAREDO: $50k → 21%AZTECA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PRESERVATION CORPORATION: $36k → 21%GIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER SOUTH TEXAS: $30k → 21%Rgisc Inc: $25k → 21%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF LAREDO: $25k → 21%LAREDO COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $25k → 21%Laredo Center for the Arts Inc: $20k → 21%LAREDO REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $15k → 21%LAREDO REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $15k → 21%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LAREDO: $50k → 21%Childrens Advocacy Center of Laredo Webb: $20k → 21%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF LAREDO: $15k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 20 repeat orgs$346k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
10

Total granted

$3.4M
$306k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+28%

Still filing today

70%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    Laredo College Education Foundation
    3× · 2022–2025 · $340k · revenue +9% · 33% of their budget
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club of Laredo Inc
    5× · 2017–2025 · $300k · revenue +46%
  • RB
    Ruthe B Cowl Rehabilitation Center
    6× · 2017–2025 · $275k · revenue +146%

Funded once

  • LC
    L C EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
  • AE
    AZTECA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PRESERVATION CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $36k · revenue +42%
  • BO
    Border Olympics Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Laredo Area Community Foundation

To inspire by generosity and empower by a legacy of giving, the Laredo Area Community Foundation provides for the philanthropic needs of Laredo and surrounding communities.

Philanthropy
2
Laredo Cultural District Inc

Promote creative and cultural attractions by engaging artisitic, commercial and educational entities in order to attract citizens and visitors.

Arts & Culture
3
Aspiring Texas Latinos Achieving Success Together

La tiendita is a resource and empowerment center whose mission is to provide access to healthy and affordable food options and help latino students and others to graduate, attain secondary education and become leaders in their school and…

Community Improvement
4
Texas State Lulac

The mission of lulac is to advance the economic condition, political, housing, health & civil rights of the hispanic population

Human Services
5
Cen-Tex Hispanic Chamber of Comm

Lead and promote the business economic, social and cultural development of the Hispanic and small business community.

Community Improvement
6
Laredo Tennis Association

The purpose of the Laredo Tennis Association (a Texas nonprofit corporation) is to promote national or international amateur sports competition and grow the game of tennis in Laredo, TX and the surrounding areas among all age groups of…

Recreation & Sports
7
Laredo Center for Urban Agriculture and Sustainability

Fulfilling quality of life and place goals and objectives of the viva laredo comprehensive plan: create and promote a scalable urban food system in laredo by increasing access to fresh, local food for all citizens, especially low-income…

Food & Nutrition
8
Llano Chamber of Commerce

To assist the local business, governmental and individual community in developing better business relationships and to increase the local revenue base by encouraging tourism and business development.

—
9
United Way of Laredo Inc

Financial support for other 501(c)(3) organizations, including accepted health, welfare and recreational agencies.

Philanthropy
10
Ldf Nonprofit Foundation

The purpose of the Corporation is to stimulate economic development in the Laredo and surrounding areas, which will be accomplished by supporting business investment and growth through services offered by our Corporation, including support…

—
11
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies
—
12
Mexican American Legislative Policy Council

To provide research and policy analysis to members of the mexican american legislative caucus. to advocate for latino rights and issues in the state of texas.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Laredo Theater Guild International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Childrens Advocacy Center of Laredo-Web. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
13/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $1,285,344 · OtherTEXAS A&M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITYBoys and Girls Club of Laredo Inc: $300,000 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of Laredo IncSCHOLARSHIPS (DETAIL AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST): $170,000 · OtherSCHOLARSHIPS (DETAIL AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST)L C EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherL C EDUCATION FOUNDATIONLaredo College: $125,000 · OtherLaredo College+13 more: $292,188 · Other+13 moreLaredo College Education Foundation: $340,000 · EducationLaredo Colleg…University of the Incarnate Word: $99,000 · EducationUniversity of…+1 more: $10,000 · EducationRuthe B Cowl Rehabilitation Center: $275,000 · HealthRuthe B Cow…Childrens Advocacy Center of Laredo-Web: $85,000 · HealthChildrens A…+1 more: $10,000 · HealthLaredo Theater Guild International Inc: $107,000 · Arts & CultureLAREDO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $73,698 · Arts & CultureLAREDO MAIN STREET INC: $70,000 · Arts & CultureLaredo Center for the Arts Inc: $20,000 · Arts & CultureCommunities In Schools of Laredo Inc: $120,000 · Community ImprovementSTREETS OF LAREDO MALL INC: $91,460 · Community ImprovementSOUTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $15,000 · Community ImprovementJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $50,000 · InternationalRGISC INC: $45,000 · Environment
Other$2,322,532Education$449,000Health$370,000Arts & Culture$270,698Community Improvement$226,460International$50,000Environment$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLaredo College Education Foundation: $340,000 over 3y, 33% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Laredo Inc: $300,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetRuthe B Cowl Rehabilitation Center: $275,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetCommunities In Schools of Laredo Inc: $120,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetLaredo Theater Guild International Inc: $107,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetUniversity of the Incarnate Word: $99,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTREETS OF LAREDO MALL INC: $91,460 over 3y, 25% of budgetChildrens Advocacy Center of Laredo-Web: $85,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetLAREDO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $73,698 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $50,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetRGISC INC: $45,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetLaredo Regional Food Bank: $40,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF GREATER SOUTH TEXAS: $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAZTECA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PRESERVATION CORPORATION: $35,588 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetBorder Olympics Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCASA DE MISERICORDIA: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLaredo Center for the Arts Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTH TEXAS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Laredo Diploma Plus Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetMERCY MINISTRIES OF LAREDO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Guadalupe and Lil…Laredo Area Community…Womens City Club of L…Lamar Bruni Vergara T…The John G and Marie …American Electric Pow…Matias DE Llano Chari…The Prairie FoundationUnited Way of Laredo …A R Tony and Maria J …Friedman-Kline Family…Greater Houston Commu…
The Guadalupe and Lilia Martinez FoundationTX39.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Guadalupe and Lilia Martinez Foundation · Laredo Area Community Foundation · Womens City Club of Laredo · Lamar Bruni Vergara Trust · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Matias DE Llano Charitable Trust · The Prairie Foundation · United Way of Laredo Inc · A R Tony and Maria J Sanchez Family Foundation · Friedman-Kline Family Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization D D Hachar Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from D D Hachar Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on D D Hachar’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home