Skip to content
D & E Steinmetz Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

D & E Steinmetz Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$273k
Granted FY2025still arriving
81
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0169% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$870kReligion$467kCommunity Improvement$149kHousing & Shelter$38kArts & Culture$33kYouth Development$26kHuman Services$3kHealth$966Other$0
02FY2025 · 81 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k72 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $138k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
$320
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$61,000
cong YTL so 8th$23,000
cong simchas aharon$22,100
via 138 Midletown LLc$20,339
UTA$20,200
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
via 570-4b llc$12,760
Cong Givas Pinchus$10,000
Yeshiva Ketana Satmar$8,900
Elef Hamugein$7,600
Individual grant recipient$5,700
Pupa Yeshiva$5,200
Individual grant recipient$3,000
CONG OHEL TORAH$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%cenTRAL UTA OF MONSEY: $21k → 14%Yeshiva Ketana Satmar: $9k → 14%cong YTL so 8th: $23k → 17%cong simchas aharon: $22k → 20%CONG VAYOEL MOSHE SATMAR REMSEN INC: $5k → 14%CONG GIVAS PINCHUS: $20k → 20%CONG BAIS NAFTALI DRATZFERT: $5k → 14%Madani Hashabos: $15k → 20%Cong Givas Pinchus: $10k → 20%CONG GIVAS PINCHUS: $10k → 20%cong simchas aharon: $10k → 20%CONG GIVAS PINCHUS: $5k → 20%Torah Center: $20k → 20%CONGREATION TIFERES MORDECHAI INC: $6k → 20%givat pinchus: $15k → 20%CONG YEITEV LEV: $10k → 20%DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $455k → 14%CONG TIFERES NAFTALI: $7k → 20%DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $200k → 14%DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $140k → 14%DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $75k → 14%via 138 mittleton llc: $42k → 14%via 570-4b llc: $22k → 14%via 570-4b llc: $13k → 14%CONGREGATION DCHASIDAI VIZNITZ WILLIAMSBURG: $85k → 20%cong adas yerim: $10k → 20%kahal adas paye: $5k → 20%Machne Rav Tov: $61k → 20%KOLEL BAIS AVROHOM D-SPINKA: $60k → 20%CONG TIFERES MOSHE INC: $52k → 20%UTA: $34k → 20%UTS: $30k → 20%CHEVRAS TZIRIM YAD EFRAIM OSTROWCE OF BOYAN INC: $30k → 20%HAMATIV: $25k → 20%UTA: $20k → 20%TOLDOS TZVI: $15k → 20%Cong Arugath Habosem: $15k → 20%TOLDOS TZVI: $13k → 20%HAMATIV: $12k → 20%Machne Rav Tov: $9k → 20%Elef Hamugein: $8k → 20%TOLDOS TZVI: $7k → 20%Payle Yoetz: $6k → 20%Pupa Yeshiva: $5k → 20%MACHNA RAV TOV: $5k → 20%via 138 Midletown LLc: $26k → 20%via 138 Midletown LLc: $25k → 20%via 138 Midletown LLc: $20k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 43 repeat orgs$438k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 46 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
69

Total granted

$1.4M
$362k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+65%

Still filing today

9%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthPublic BenefitInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HAMATIV INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $38k · revenue +83% · 25% of their budget
  • BH
    Bikvei Hatzon Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +8%
  • KI
    KAPAYIM INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $910 · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • CD
    CONGREGATION DCHASIDAI VIZNITZ WILLIAMSBURG
    one grant, 2022 · $85k
  • CT
    CONG TIFERES MOSHE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $52k
  • V1
    via 138 mittleton llc
    one grant, 2021 · $42k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 158 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $870,044 · OtherDETAILS OF CONTRIBUTION TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUESTCONGREGATION DCHASIDAI VIZNITZ WILLIAMSBURG: $85,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $72,725 · Othervia 138 Midletown LLc: $71,627 · OtherKOLEL BAIS AVROHOM D-SPINKA: $63,500 · Other+148 more: $676,749 · Other+148 moreHAMATIV INC: $38,300 · ReligionBikvei Hatzon Inc: $2,810 · ReligionKAPAYIM INC: $910 · HealthVYAZREIM INC: $420 · Public BenefitKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM: $50 · International
Other$1,839,645Religion$41,110Health$910Public Benefit$420International$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAMATIV INC: $38,300 over 2y, 25% of budgetBikvei Hatzon Inc: $2,810 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKAPAYIM INC: $910 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVYAZREIM INC: $420 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTZEMACH YIFROCH FOUNDATION: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARIDY GLOBAL FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAMATIV INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundS&E FoundationHps FoundationBochner FoundationThe Lexicon Foundatio…American Friends of B…A&E Hauer Family Foun…Nimlach FoundationBlum FoundationI&S FoundationZelig and Rifky Weiss…Yr Foundation
The Ojc FundNY66.3× affinity51 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · S&E Foundation · Hps Foundation · Bochner Foundation · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · A&E Hauer Family Foundation · Nimlach Foundation · Blum Foundation · I&S Foundation · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · Yr Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization D & E Steinmetz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from D & E Steinmetz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to D & E Steinmetz Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to D & E Steinmetz Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 158 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on D & E Steinmetz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home