Skip to content

· Public charity

Curt Landry Ministries Internationa

To be a bridge of unity and restoration between israel and the church, to that end the ministries main program is to bring revival to israel, the church, and the nations through a deeper understanding and revelation of the power of the covenant, and to facilitate covenant restoration through the reconciliation of jews and gentiles coming…

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$338kFood & Nutrition$22kHousing & Shelter$12kInternational$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $148,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,440,324 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,292,324 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $48k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$36,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VICTORY BIBLE INSTITUTE$100,000
HOUSE OF DAVID$36,000
DOUBLE PORTION INC$12,000
02The need
03

Where the grant dollars land

Across the US and around the world.

Grants abroad, by region: $1.3M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Region not stated$1.3M · 100% · 1 grant
How this is measured
Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$225k · 5 repeat orgs$166k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$225k
$66k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOUSE OF DAVID
    4× · 2017–2020 · $120k
  • HO
    HOUSE OF DAVID
    2× · 2023–2024 · $54k
  • DP
    DOUBLE PORTION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $22k

Funded once

  • EL
    ELIJAH LIST MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • RC
    RESTORATION CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $14k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOUSE OF DAVID: $119,777 · OtherHOUSE OF DAVIDVICTORY BIBLE INSTITUTE: $100,000 · OtherVICTORY BIBLE INSTITUTEHOUSE OF DAVID: $53,920 · OtherHOUSE OF DAVIDDOUBLE PORTION INC: $22,000 · OtherDOUBLE PORTION INCELIJAH LIST MINISTRIES: $20,000 · OtherRIVER OF LIFE MINISTRIES INT'L: $17,413 · OtherRESTORATION CHURCH: $14,166 · Other+5 more: $43,475 · Other+5 more
Other$390,751

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Curt Landry Ministries Internationa?

Find your warmest path to Curt Landry Ministries Internationa through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Curt Landry Ministries Internationa’s filings →

More from the funding graph