· Private foundation
CTE Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Misc Charities | $109,282 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $635) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
30 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MCMisc Charities2× · 2024–2025 · $259k
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2021–2023 · $84k
- BCBAIS CHUNA2× · 2020–2021 · $51k
Funded once
- IHICHID HATORAH VHACHESEDone grant, 2022 · $74k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $25k
- RCRAV CHESEDone grant, 2021 · $18k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…
To support organizations that assist ill and disabled individuals, within the United States and Israel, with transportation, food, medical supplies, retreats and volunteer assistance.
To help ill persons
Assist the poor, Infirm, Handicapped and the underprivileged
Charitable work to help people in need
To provide financial assistance to religious and charitable organizations worldwide to help them continue their activities.
To provide and coordinate distribution of financial aid, meals, transportation,and other daily needs to the sick and handicapped families in the Passaic- Clifton area.
Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations
Providing financial assistance to emergency organizations as well as other charitable, educational, and religious organizations worldwide.
To provide financial and other assistance to needy persons and families in Israel
Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 103 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · A&E Hauer Family Foundation · Bochner Foundation · Blum Foundation · S&E Foundation · Keren Ish Foundation · Nimlach Foundation · Strulovich Family Foundation Trust · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · Chayim V Chesed · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · J&G Family Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization CTE Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from CTE Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on CTE’s filings →