· Public charity
Csi Support & Development Services
Development, management and operation of housing projects for low income senior citizens.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $484,876 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $580,605 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $95,729 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $250k+1 grant · $479k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HIGHLANDTOWN 2 LP | $478,876 |
| CITIZENS' HOUSING AND PLANNING ASSOCIATION INC | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 1% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Development, management and operation of housing projects for low income senior citizens.
To provide housing facilities for low income senior citizens.
To acquire, own, improve, and operate a low-income rental housing community.
To acquire, own, improve, and operate a low-income rental housing community.
To provide decent affordable housing for persons of low and moderate income, including elderly and physically handicapped persons and families, and services specially designed to meet their physical, social and psychological needs, and to…
None
Clawson manor seeks to provide apartment-type housing to elderly and disabled individuals wishing to live in an environment that promotes independent living.
Provide subsidized housing (37 unit complex) for elderly and handicapped low income seniors under section 202 of the national housing act and the u.s. department of housing and urban development.
Miracle mile senior citizen housing corporation, a california nonprofit corporation, was formed to own a 28-unit rental housing project for the elderly located in los angeles, california. the operations of the project began december 1,…
The organization's mission is to provide housing, health care, and other personal services to elderly residents through the operation of a continuing care retirement community in tampa, florida.
Wesley at murray, inc. is a not-for-profit general welfare corporation formed in february 2001, in accordance with the not-for-profit statutes of the commonwealth of kentucky. the corporation was formed for the purpose of operating a…
Operates a 130 unit apartment complex specifically for low and moderate income elderly persons located in oakland, california.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dunn Family Senior Citizens Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is Citizens' Housing and Planning Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COOPERATIVE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LABELLE TOWERS INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERVIEW NON-PROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BISHOP NON-PROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds DEARBORN HEIGHTS (CSI) NON-PROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ROYAL OAK NON-PROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ESSEX NON-PROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds DUNN FAMILY SENIOR CITIZENS HOME INC ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS' HOUSING AND PLANNING ASSOCIATION INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Csi Support & Development Services funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Citizens' Housing and Planning Association Inc — 26% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Csi Support & Development Services?
Find your warmest path to Csi Support & Development Services through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.