Skip to content

· Public charity

Cry-Child Rights and You America Inc

Cry america's strength lies in its donors, volunteers & project partners who have come together to change the situation of underprivileged children.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$155kCivil Rights$135kHuman Services$60kInternational$20kFood & Nutrition$10k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $100,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,525,368 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,425,368 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA$50,000
CHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Child Welfare League of America: $20k → 7%Child Welfare League of America: $20k → 7%Child Welfare League of America: $20k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $1.4M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South Asia$1.4M · 100% · 36 grants

Stated purpose: TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE SERVICES, REDUCE MALNUTRITION; ENSURE CHILDREN ARE ENROLLED & RETAINED IN SCHOOL & RIGHT TO EDUCATION MILESTONES ARE IMPLEMENTED IN SCHOOLS. · IMPROVE COMMUNITY'S ACCESS TO QUALITY HEALTHCARE; REDUCE MATERNAL & CHILD MORTALITY RATES; REDUCE MALNUTRITION; STRENGTHEN & BUILD CAPACITY OF ADOLESCENT COLLECTIVES. · TO ENSURE ENROLLMENT & RETENTION OF CHILDREN IN SCHOOLS IN 24 VILLAGES & ADDRESSING CHILD MARRIAGE & CHILD LABOR

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$370k · 5 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against -44% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
1

Total granted

$370k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
-44%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’24
Civil RightsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $135k · revenue +110%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $135k · revenue +62%
  • CW
    CHILD WELFARE LEAGUE OF AMERICA
    3× · 2017–2019 · $60k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • SHARE OUR STRENGTH
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
GoodWeave International

GoodWeave works to stop child and forced labor in global supply chains. Permanently.

International
2
Family Access Fighting for Childrens Rights
—
3
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
4
Childrens Advocacy Institute-Child Welfare
—
5
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
6
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
7
Global Voice
—
8
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
9
Childfund Alliance

Childfund alliance is a global network of 11 child-focused development and humanitarian organizations working in more than 70 countries. we help nearly 30 million children and their families to overcome poverty and the underlying…

International
10
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
11
Youth Power Project

Breaking down barriers between lawmakers & youth by centering voices & stories of young people in policymaking at local, state, & federal levels. We are working on a nationwide campaign to uplift survivors of child sexual abuse and provide…

—
12
We Are Family Foundation

The we are family foundation celebrates the vision of a global family by creating and supporting programs that inspire and educate people about mutual respect, understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Rights Inc; the most unlike its peers is Whiteman 4G Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC: $135,000 · Civil RightsCHILDREN'S RIGHTS INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $135,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICACHILD WELFARE LEAGUE OF AMERICA: $60,000 · Human ServicesCHILD WELFARE LEA…FRIENDS OF YOUTH: $20,000 · HealthSave The Children Federation Inc: $20,000 · InternationalSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $10,000 · Other
Civil Rights$135,000Youth Development$135,000Human Services$60,000Health$20,000International$20,000Other$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S RIGHTS INC: $135,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $135,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD WELFARE LEAGUE OF AMERICA: $60,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF YOUTH: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cry-Child Rights and You America Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cry-Child Rights and You America Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cry-Child Rights and You America’s filings →

More from the funding graph