Skip to content

· Private foundation

Crissinger Donna Daniel Scholarship Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$481kScience & Tech$6k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$24,000
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY$12,000
UNIVERSITY OF FINDLAY$12,000
ASHLAND UNIVERSITY$6,000
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$6,000
MOUNT VERNON NAZARENE UNIVERSITY$6,000
THE OHIO STATE MARION CAMPUS$6,000
MARION TECHNICAL COLLEGE$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF FINDLAY: $12k → 9%ASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 12%MOUNT VERNON NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 12%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $24k → 15%MARION TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $6k → 17%THE OHIO STATE MARION CAMPUS: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$407k · 13 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$407k
$45k

Still filing today

54%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MV
    Mount Vernon Nazarene University
    5× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +14%
  • BW
    Baldwin Wallace University
    4× · 2020–2023 · $21k · revenue +8%
  • TB
    THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $21k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • CS
    COLUMBIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • CS
    COLUMBUS STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • TR
    TRI RIVERS ADULT EDUCATION
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
2
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
3
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
University of Mount Union

The university affirms the institution's mission to prepare students for fulfilling lives, meaningful work and responsible citizenship. the university of mount union offers undergraduate and graduate degrees in a wide array of academic…

Education
7
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
8
Heidelberg University

Heidelberg university's mission and programs are firmly rooted in liberal arts with innovative coursework in sciences, global education, business and related graduate-level programs. quality education, services to students, a close…

Education
9
Roberts Wesleyan University

As new york's leading university for character education, rwu is a community of learners committed to historic christianity which seeks to prepare thoughtful, spiritually mature, service-oriented people who will transform society.

Education
10
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
11
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
12
Franklin University

Since 1902, Franklin University has been a pioneer in meeting the needs of adult students who have the ambition to continue their education in combination with other responsibilities, receiving its status as a tax exempt organization in…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ashland University; the most unlike its peers is Mount Vernon Nazarene University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $154,500 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVERSITYMARION TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $55,500 · OtherMARION TECHNICAL COLLEGETHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $24,000 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITYBOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $24,000 · OtherBOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITYMIAMI UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · OtherSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · Other+10 more: $50,750 · Other+10 moreMount Vernon Nazarene University: $27,000 · EducationMount Vernon Nazarene UniversityThe University of Findlay: $24,000 · EducationThe University of FindlayBaldwin Wallace University: $21,000 · EducationBaldwin Wallace UniversityTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE: $21,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTEN…Otterbein University: $16,500 · EducationOtterbein UniversityCALVIN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · EducationCALVIN UNIVERSITYASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · EducationASHLAND UNIVERSITYPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,981 · Education
Other$347,750Education$139,481

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMount Vernon Nazarene University: $27,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Findlay: $24,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBaldwin Wallace University: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOtterbein University: $16,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALVIN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,981 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mount Vernon Nazarene University ↗
  • Who funds The University of Findlay ↗
  • Who funds Baldwin Wallace University ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Otterbein University ↗
  • Who funds CALVIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ASHLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crissinger Donna Daniel Scholarship Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crissinger Donna Daniel Scholarship Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Crissinger Donna Daniel Scholarship’s filings →

More from the funding graph