Skip to content
Credit Union Miracle Day Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Credit Union Miracle Day Inc

Cumd raises money to support children's miracle network (cmn) hospitals after payment of race, title, sponsorship fees, and minimal operating costs, all funds collected are redistributaed, so every dollar generated is returned to the cmn affiliated hospitals serving local communities.

$258k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$182k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.2MEducation$51k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $230,638, the rows itemized in this filing. The $258,254 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $27,616 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $49k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $182k
$14,038
Median grant
5
States reached
$378k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM$181,600
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN$15,000
JOHNS HOPKINS CHILDREN'S CENTER$14,038
COHEN CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER OF$10,000
DUKE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PENN STATE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $11k → 12%COHEN CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER OF NY: $10k → 6%UNM CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $5k → 14%CHILDREN'S NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM: $254k → 14%UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE: $10k → 14%MINISTRY SAINT JOSEPH CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $20k → 11%GUNDERSEN HEALTH SYSTEM: $20k → 12%DUKE CHILDREN'S: $20k → 11%RILEY HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 16%JOHNS HOPKINS CHILDREN'S CENTER: $21k → 19%PENN STATE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $11k → 12%COHEN CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER OF NY: $10k → 6%CHILDREN'S NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM: $240k → 14%DUKE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & HEALTH CENTER: $20k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS CHILDREN'S CENTER (MARYLAND): $17k → 19%PENN STATE HERSHEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 12%COHEN CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER OF NY: $10k → 6%CHILDREN'S NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM: $232k → 14%DUKE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & HEALTH CENTER: $20k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS CHILDREN'S CENTER: $14k → 19%PENN STATE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 12%COHEN CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER OF NY: $10k → 6%CHILDREN'S NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM: $222k → 14%DUKE CHILDREN'S: $20k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS CHILDREN'S CENTER: $14k → 19%PENN STATE HERSHEY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 12%COHEN CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER OF: $10k → 6%CHILDREN'S NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM: $182k → 14%DUKE CHILDREN'S: $20k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS CHILDREN'S CENTER: $11k → 19%PENN STATE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $6k → 12%COHEN CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER OF: $10k → 6%CHILDREN'S NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM: $160k → 14%DUKE CHILDREN'S: $11k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS CHILDREN'S CENTER: $11k → 19%PENN STATE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $6k → 12%COHEN CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER OF: $10k → 6%CHILDREN'S NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM: $156k → 14%DUKE CHILDREN'S: $10k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS CHILDREN'S CENTER: $10k → 19%COHEN CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER OF: $10k → 6%CHILDREN'S NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM: $121k → 14%DUKE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS CHILDREN'S CENTER (MARYLAND): $9k → 19%CHILDREN'S NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM: $103k → 14%DUKE CHILDREN'S: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
IN
PA
MD
NM
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 8 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$2.1M
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+62%

Still filing today

88%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +95%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $141k · revenue +51%
  • TJ
    THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $107k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • GL
    Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +42%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +128%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S DIETARY SERVICES (HOME DELIVERED MEALS)
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
3
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Children's Medical Group Inc

To provide quality, accessible primary health care services to all children in our community, advocate for the well-being of all children, educate children, families, health care professionals and our community regarding the health of…

Health
5
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
6
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
7
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
8
Pediatric Physician Services Inc

The corporation is organized for charitable, educational and scientific purposes, and to provide healthcare services of pediatric specialty physicians and other personnel to the patients of johns hopkins all children's hospital and…

—
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Shands Jacksonville Healthcare Inc

As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Johns Hopkins All Children's Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Johns Hopkins Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,669,638 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $106,553 · HealthTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL+6 more: $200,500 · Health+6 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY: $141,000 · EducationSHANDS JACKSONVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $62,500 · OtherST JOSEPH'S DIETARY SERVICES (HOME DELIVERED MEALS): $20,000 · OtherJames Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Health$1,976,691Education$156,000Other$82,500Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,669,638 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $141,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $106,553 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC: $60,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL FUND OF NEW YORK: $40,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetLONG ISLAND JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHANDS JACKSONVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJames Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Credit Union Miracle Day Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Credit Union Miracle Day Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Johns Hopkins Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Credit Union Miracle Day Inc?

Find your warmest path to Credit Union Miracle Day Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Credit Union Miracle Day’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home