Skip to content

· Public charity

County Supervisors Association of Calif

The mission of the organization is to serve california counties by: developing and equipping county leaders to better serve their communities; effectively advocating and partnering with state and federal governments for appropriate policies, laws, and funding; and communicating the value of critical work being accomplished by county…

$596k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Benefit$3.4MEnvironment$141kCivil Rights$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$20k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $575,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $596,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $21,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA COUNTIES FOUNDATION$400,000
INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT$80,000
CLIMATE SAFE INFRASTRUCTURE COALITION$50,000
CALMATTERS$25,000
REBUILD NORTHBAY FOUNDATION - AFTER THE FIRE USA$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%REBUILD NORTHBAY FOUNDATION - AFTER THE FIRE USA: $20k → 9%CALIFORNIA COUNTIES FOUNDATION: $560k → 12%CALIFORNIA COUNTIES FOUNDATION: $509k → 12%CALIFORNIA COUNTIES FOUNDATION: $400k → 12%CALIFORNIA COUNTIES FOUNDATION: $344k → 12%CALIFORNIA COUNTIES FOUNDATION: $323k → 12%CALIFORNIA COUNTIES FOUNDATION: $266k → 12%California Counties Foundation: $221k → 12%CALIFORNIA COUNTIES FOUNDATION: $100k → 12%INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT: $80k → 12%Institute for Local Government: $80k → 12%INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT: $80k → 12%INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT: $80k → 12%INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT: $80k → 12%INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT: $80k → 12%INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT: $80k → 12%INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT: $80k → 12%INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT: $80k → 12%CLIMATE SAFE INFRASTRUCTURE COALITION: $50k → 12%CCS Partnership: $35k → 12%CCS PARTNERSHIP: $35k → 12%CALMATTERS: $25k → 12%CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE ECONOMY: $21k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 3 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +158% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
1

Total granted

$3.5M
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+158%
0%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitPhilanthropyCivil RightsPublic Safety & DisasterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CALIFORNIA COUNTIES FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +158% · 46% of their budget
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $720k · revenue -12%
  • CP
    CCS Partnership
    2× · 2017–2018 · $70k

Funded once

  • CF
    California Foundation on the Environment & the Economy
    one grant, 2024 · $21k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
1/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALIFORNIA COUNTIES FOUNDATION: $2,723,321 · Public BenefitCALIFORNIA COUNTIES FOUNDATIONINSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT: $720,000 · Public BenefitINSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTCCS Partnership: $70,000 · OtherCANDID: $50,000 · PhilanthropyCalMatters: $25,000 · Civil RightsCalifornia Foundation on the Environment & the Economy: $21,000 · EnvironmentREBUILD NORTH BAY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Public Benefit$3,443,321Other$70,000Philanthropy$50,000Civil Rights$25,000Environment$21,000Public Safety & Disaster$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA COUNTIES FOUNDATION: $2,723,321 over 8y, 46% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT: $720,000 over 9y, 5.6% of budgetCANDID: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCalMatters: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCalifornia Foundation on the Environment & the Economy: $21,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetREBUILD NORTH BAY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization County Supervisors Association of Calif funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from County Supervisors Association of Calif. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on County Supervisors Association of Calif’s filings →

    More from the funding graph