Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cosgrove Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$220k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$154kHuman Services$74kEducation$63kCommunity Improvement$26kReligion$25kArts & Culture$21kPublic Benefit$15kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $199k
$10,563
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Womens Resource Center$35,000
Traverse City Police Dept$34,000
Grand Traverse Metro Fire Dept$24,706
Child Family Services of NW MI$24,040
Individual grant recipient$19,450
Whitewater Emergency Services$19,228
Old Town Playhouse$17,320
City of Traverse City$15,000
First Congregational Church$10,563
Safe Harbor$9,200
Kingsley Schools$5,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Northern Michigan University$1,000
Kalamazoo Valley Comm College$1,000
Saginaw Valley State University$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 1% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Womens Resource Center: $35k → 7%Enarie Property Management: $1k → 9%First Congregational Church: $11k → 9%Kingsley Schools: $5k → 10%Hope College: $1k → 10%Northern Michigan University: $1k → 11%Kalamazoo Valley Comm College: $1k → 12%Saginaw Valley State University: $1k → 14%Michigan State University: $1k → 16%Child Family Services of NW MI: $24k → 7%First Congregational Church: $10k → 9%Traverse City Police Dept: $34k → 10%TCAPS classrooms: $22k → 7%First Congregational Church: $3k → 9%Grand Traverse Metro Fire Dept: $25k → 10%TCAPS-Blair PTO: $19k → 7%Traverse City Police Dept: $19k → 10%Old Town Playhouse: $17k → 7%Grand Traverse Metro Fire Dept: $19k → 10%TCAPS classrooms: $9k → 7%Grand Traverse Metro Fire Dept: $16k → 10%Child Family Services of NW MI: $4k → 7%City of Traverse City: $15k → 10%Old Town Playhouse: $2k → 7%Safe Harbor: $13k → 10%TCAPS classrooms: $1k → 7%Grand Traverse Metro Fire Dept: $13k → 10%Old Town Playhouse: $1k → 7%Safe Harbor: $9k → 10%Old Town Playhouse: $1k → 7%Addiction Treatment Services: $5k → 10%Grand Traverse Regional Foundation: $1k → 7%Safe Harbor: $3k → 10%Grand Traverse Regional Foundation: $500 → 7%Mt Holiday: $1k → 10%Grand Traverse Regional Foundation: $500 → 7%Grand Traverse Co Sheriff Assn: $500 → 10%City of Traverse City Utilities: $350 → 10%Whitewater Emergency Services: $19k → 10%Whitewater Emergency Services: $5k → 10%Whitewater Emergency Services: $3k → 10%Whitewater Emergency Services: $2k → 10%Whitewater Township EMS: $500 → 10%Love Thy Neighbor: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$299k · 10 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
14

Total granted

$299k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+25%

Still filing today

10%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GT
    Grand Traverse Metro Fire Dept
    4× · 2022–2025 · $72k
  • TC
    Traverse City Police Dept
    2× · 2024–2025 · $53k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2022–2024 · $32k

Funded once

  • AT
    ADDICTION TREATMENT SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +25%
  • V
    variousanonymous
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Grand Traverse Metro Fire Dept: $71,896 · OtherGrand Traverse Metro Fire DeptTraverse City Police Dept: $52,943 · OtherTraverse City Police DeptWomens Resource Center: $35,000 · OtherWomens Resource CenterIndividual grant recipient: $32,047 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWhitewater Emergency Services: $29,298 · OtherWhitewater Emergency ServicesChild Family Services of NW MI: $28,040 · OtherChild Family Services of NW MISafe Harbor: $25,801 · OtherSafe HarborFirst Congregational Church: $24,101 · OtherFirst Congregational ChurchIndividual grant recipient: $19,450 · OtherCity of Traverse City: $15,000 · Other+19 more: $37,966 · Other+19 moreOLD TOWN PLAYHOUSE INC: $20,820 · Arts & CultureMT HOLIDAY INC: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsHOPE COLLEGE: $1,000 · EducationAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $300 · Health
Other$371,542Arts & Culture$20,820Recreation & Sports$1,000Education$1,000Health$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOLD TOWN PLAYHOUSE INC: $20,820 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetADDICTION TREATMENT SERVICES INC: $4,622 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMT HOLIDAY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OLD TOWN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ADDICTION TREATMENT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MT HOLIDAY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cosgrove Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cosgrove Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cosgrove’s filings →

    More from the funding graph