Massachusetts · Public charity
Corporation for Advancement of Medical Technologies Inc
The organization represents a unique integrated multi-institutional, multi-disciplinary effort which expedites advancement, clinical evaluation and implementation of advanced imaging tools to improve screening, early diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer.
- $35k
- Granted FY2018
- 1
- Grants FY2018
- 1
- Organizations funded FY2018
- Median grant, FY2018
- $35,000
- Largest grant, FY2018
- $35,000
- States reached, FY2018
- 1
- Total assets, FY2018
- $2.1M
Top grantees
Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2018, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.
| Grantee | Total granted | Years | Share of their budget |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mass General Brigham Incorporated | $35,000 | 1 | n/a |
Compare Corporation for Advancement of Medical Technologies Inc with peer funders
About Corporation for Advancement of Medical Technologies Inc
- How much does Corporation for Advancement of Medical Technologies Inc give?
- Corporation for Advancement of Medical Technologies Inc reported 1 grants totaling $35,000 in its FY2018 IRS filing.
- What does Corporation for Advancement of Medical Technologies Inc fund?
- By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2018, its largest causes are Health (100%).
- Who are Corporation for Advancement of Medical Technologies Inc's largest grantees?
- By total granted over FY2018 to FY2018: Mass General Brigham Incorporated ($35k).
- Where is Corporation for Advancement of Medical Technologies Inc based?
- Corporation for Advancement of Medical Technologies Inc is based in MA.
Play a game based on Corporation for Advancement of Medical Technologies’ filings →
More from the funding graph
The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home