Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Cornerstone West Community Dev Corp

Cornerstone west cdc's mission is to build affordable housing to meet the needs of the new castle county residents and to serve as a proactive catalyst for community revitalization.

$491k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$44k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 64% of CORNERSTONE WEST COMMUNITY DEV CORP’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 22 grants below total $241,058 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $490,928 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $249,870 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $156k
$9,999
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE$44,302
BIBI'S BRUNCH$19,741
GREEN FOR THE GREATER GOOD$19,692
ROBERTO CLEMENTE BASEBALL LEAGUE$12,500
LAWNCARE ANGELS LLC$10,000
LOPEZ LA ESPIGA BAKERY$10,000
PRECIOUS LITTLE HANDS CHILDCARE$10,000
AKHIBACHI'S HALAL FOOD$10,000
AKI'S ALLIED LLC$10,000
D'INDUSTRY MEN'S STUDIO$10,000
RIVERS OF LEARNING ACADEMY$9,999
EVELYN'S SOUL FOOD$9,650
HAN DOVER YOUR ROVER$9,420
PASTRIES AND MORE BY SUGAR SAVAGE LLC$8,807
DELAWARE CENTER FOR DANCE$6,473
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HISPANIC AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF DELAWARE INC: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$461k · 7 repeat orgs$406k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
17

Total granted

$461k
$175k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
0%

Still filing today

43%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $231k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    Be Ready Community Development Corporation
    6× · 2019–2024 · $150k · revenue +40%
  • PS
    PETER SPENCER FAMILY LIFE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $85k · revenue +72%
  • HI
    HELP INITIATIVE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $28k · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • CF
    CORLETO-LATINA FUNERAL HOME
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • MR
    MRS ROBINO'S RESTAURANT
    one grant, 2019 · $16k
  • VL
    VISION LEARNING CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Better Business Bureau of Delaware Foundation
Community Improvement
2
La Casa Dominicana the Dominican House

Free esl and naturalization class to the communities

Unclassified
3
Delaware County Community Partnership Inc

Dedicated to improving the quality of life for the people of delaware county by encouraging healthy attitudes and behaviors.

Crime & Legal
4
United Latinos Promoviendo Accion Civica

to develop and empower community leaders to achieve an informed and healthy community by providing civic engagement through advocacy and education to improve the quality of life.

Civil Rights
5
Sustainable Energy Utility Inc

To serve the sustainable energy needs of all delaware energy consumers using all fuels.

Environment
6
Keep Delaware Beautiful Inc

To foster and promote keep america beautiful programs in delaware. as the state affiliate of the nation's largest volunteer based community action and education organization, keep america beautiful, inc, the mission is focused on litter…

Environment
7
Delaware County Economic Development Commission

Industry expansion in delaware county

8
Better Living Center Community Development Corporation

To help improve the lives of the residents of Chester through provision of essential services, bridging the digital divide, and providing information that will empower residents to support themselves. We provide resources, programs, and…

Community Improvement
9
Highland Park Urban Development Initiative
Community Improvement
10
More

Community Development services

Public Benefit
11
Wilmington Placemakers Inc

Promote, support, grow community culture

Community Improvement
12
Westchesterr Latinos Unidos Inc

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hispanic American Association of Delaware Inc and the most unlike its peers is Roberto Clemente Baseball League Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF WILMINGTON — $144,025 · OtherCITY OF WILMINGTONUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE — $44,302 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARECORLETO-LATINA FUNERAL HOME — $20,000 · OtherBIBI'S BRUNCH — $19,741 · OtherWALTER'S STEAKHOUSE — $18,810 · OtherLOPEZ LA ESPIGA BAKERY — $18,627 · Other+32 more — $293,053 · Other+32 moreBe Ready Community Development Corporation — $150,449 · Recreation & SportsBe Ready Community De…ROBERTO CLEMENTE BASEBALL LEAGUE INC — $12,500 · Recreation & SportsROBERTO CLEMENTE BASE…PETER SPENCER FAMILY LIFE FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 · Youth DevelopmentPETER SPENC…HELP INITIATIVE INC — $27,574 · Housing & ShelterGREEN FOR THE GREATER GOOD — $19,692 · Community ImprovementLA PLAZA DELAWARE INC — $7,500 · Community ImprovementHISPANIC AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF DELAWARE INC — $6,125 · Human Services
Other$558,558Recreation & Sports$162,949Youth Development$85,000Housing & Shelter$27,574Community Improvement$27,192Human Services$6,125

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBe Ready Community Development Corporation — $150,449 over 6y, 9.2% of budgetPETER SPENCER FAMILY LIFE FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE — $44,302 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELP INITIATIVE INC — $27,574 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetLA PLAZA DELAWARE INC — $7,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Be Ready Community Development Corporation
  • Who funds PETER SPENCER FAMILY LIFE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
  • Who funds HELP INITIATIVE INC
  • Who funds GREEN FOR THE GREATER GOOD
  • Who funds ROBERTO CLEMENTE BASEBALL LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds LA PLAZA DELAWARE INC
  • Who funds HISPANIC AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF DELAWARE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Longwood Foundation IncDE13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Longwood Foundation Inc · Delaware Community Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cornerstone West Community Dev Corp funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
2021222324
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 28%
  • Be Ready Community Development Corporation100% of income from government
  • University of Delaware28% of income from government
  • Hispanic American Association of Delaware Inc13% of income from government
  • La Plaza Delaware Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2024

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph