Skip to content
Copa Health Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Copa Health Inc

Copa health is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to inspiring health, hope, and happiness through high-quality, integrated services for individuals, families, and communities.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$181kCommunity Improvement$39kEducation$15kEmployment$10kHuman Services$7kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $20,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $95,296 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $75,296 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $97k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Marc Community Resources Inc: $59k → 11%Marc Community Resources Inc: $38k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$205k · 4 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$205k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
0%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $97k · revenue -14%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $58k · revenue +16%
  • AB
    ARIZONA BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $32k

Funded once

  • GA
    GREATHEARTS ARIZONA
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +2%
  • DF
    DREAM FOUNDATION ARIZONA
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Dons of Arizona
Education
2
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
—
3
Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

—
4
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
5
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
6
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
7
Greater Phoenix Economic Council

The organization's mission is to attract and grow quality businesses and advocate for greater phoenix's competitiveness.

Community Improvement
8
Coyote Quarterback Club
Education
9
Arizona Health Care Association Inc

Ahca works to influence society and government to invest in the wellbeing of elderly and disabled individuals and to assure access to longterm care. ahca is committed to developing sound public policy whilebalancing economic and regulatory…

—
10
Arizona Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics

Azaap is committed to improving the health of arizona children and supporting the pediatric professionals who care for them.

Health
11
Arizona Masonry Council

The council is organized and operates exclusively to promote the interests of the concrete masonry industry in arizona. the council intends to further these interests by engaging in a number of activities which may include, but are not…

Community Improvement
12
Solutions for an Independent Arizona

Organization mission solutions for an independent arizona envisions an arizona addresses its most pressing issues. independent arizona will identify, unite, and engage voters who want to elect people who will find common ground to serve…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce; the most unlike its peers is Dream Foundation Arizona. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Heart Association Inc: $58,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS AS…SOLARI INC: $17,500 · HealthSOLARI INCMARCH OF DIMES INC: $8,460 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCMARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $96,935 · Human ServicesMARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INCARIZONA BUSINESS & DEVELOPMENT INC: $32,152 · OtherARIZONA BUSINESS &…CHANDLER COMPADRES INC: $6,741 · OtherCHANDLER COMPADRES…GREATER PHOENIX CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $6,500 · OtherGREATER PHOENIX CH…GREATHEARTS ARIZONA: $15,000 · EducationDREAM FOUNDATION ARIZONA: $10,000 · EmploymentNATIONAL QUARTERBACK CLUB CHARITIES INC: $5,185 · Recreation & Sports
Health$103,960Human Services$96,935Other$45,393Education$15,000Employment$10,000Recreation & Sports$5,185

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARC COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $96,935 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $58,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLARI INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATHEARTS ARIZONA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREAM FOUNDATION ARIZONA: $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $8,460 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHANDLER COMPADRES INC: $6,741 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER PHOENIX CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $6,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL QUARTERBACK CLUB CHARITIES INC: $5,185 over 1y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Mercy Care
Mercy CareAZ13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mercy Care

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Copa Health Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Copa Health Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Copa Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home