Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Cookies for Kids Cancer a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation

Cookies for kids' cancer is a national 501(c)3 non-profit committed to raising funds for research to develop new, improved, and less toxic treatments for pediatric cancer - the 1 disease killer of children in the u.s.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$675k
Largest
01What you fund
0180% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Health$9.3MOther$2.4M
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k6 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $675k
$200,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$675,000
CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FDTN$224,000
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$200,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CEN$200,000
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$200,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRAN$200,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$125,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 81% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $400k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $350k → 22%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CTR: $400k → 17%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $675k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $300k → 5%SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $200k → 9%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $200k → 16%CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FDTN: $274k → 22%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CEN: $209k → 17%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $587k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $200k → 5%SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $200k → 9%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $200k → 16%CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FDTN: $274k → 22%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CEN: $200k → 17%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $400k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $200k → 5%SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $100k → 9%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $200k → 16%CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FDTN: $224k → 22%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CEN: $200k → 17%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $300k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $150k → 5%SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $50k → 9%DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $100k → 16%CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FDTN: $207k → 22%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CTR: $200k → 17%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $300k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $125k → 5%SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $50k → 9%DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $200k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $200k → 22%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CTR: $200k → 17%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $200k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $100k → 5%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER INSTITUTE: $200k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $200k → 22%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CEN: $163k → 17%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $150k → 16%CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FDTN: $151k → 22%TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $150k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $150k → 22%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $150k → 22%CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FDTN: $144k → 22%CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FDTN: $144k → 22%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $100k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 8 repeat orgs$400k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +88% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$11M
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+27%

Still filing today

88%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    Texas Children's Hospital
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +78%
  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +89%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • FH
    FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $200k · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

6
Children's Research Institute

Children's research institute dba children's national research institute conducts and promotes translational and clinical medical research and education programs that lead to improved understanding, prevention, treatment, and care of…

Health
7
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
8
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
9
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
10
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
11
Children's Hospital Colorado

To improve the health of children through the provision of high-quality, coordinated programs of patient care, education, research and advocacy.

Health
12
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Foundation

Children's hospital of pittsburgh foundation is the sole fundraising arm of upmc children's hospital of pittsburgh.the foundation exists to provide financial support for the hospital's mission of improving the health and well-being of…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Texas Children's Hospital — $2,762,000 · HealthTexas Children's HospitalMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $1,571,867 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTERTHE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION INC — $1,415,800 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION INCTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $1,150,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIADana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $1,100,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,075,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC+1 more — $200,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $1,550,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORN…Seattle Children's Foundation — $600,000 · OtherSeattle Children's Fou…FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $200,000 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER…
Health$9,274,667Other$2,350,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTexas Children's Hospital — $2,762,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $1,571,867 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION INC — $1,415,800 over 7y, 24% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $1,150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $1,100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,075,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation — $600,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds Seattle Children's Foundation
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cookies for Kids Cancer a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cookies for Kids Cancer a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation?

Find your warmest path to Cookies for Kids Cancer a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph