Skip to content
Continuing Education Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Continuing Education Inc

CEI MISSION STATEMENT FISCAL YE 3.31.2024Continuing Education, Inc is a Not-For-Profit educational organization whose mission is to provide continuing activities that earn credits for professionals attending.These conferees are required to earn these credits to maintain licensure.

$90k
Granted FY2020
4
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Education$346kHealth$21kInternational$21kCrime & Legal$18k
02FY2020 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$19,296
Median grant
3
States reached
$181k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW YORK STATE NURSE ASSN$51,543
DILLEHAY MGT GROUP$19,296
SOUTHERN ILLINIOS UNIV$11,810
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYS$7,505
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 62% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SERENA GROUP: $8k → 8%PARAGON NURSING EDUCATION: $22k → 8%STONY BROOK SCHOOL OF MED: $20k → 7%NEW YORK STATE NURSE ASSN: $52k → 14%GLOBAL ORG FOR LEADERSHIP DEV: $10k → 10%VIETNAMESE AMERICAN MED ASSN: $7k → 11%TEXAS CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE: $9k → 16%NACE: $17k → 13%INTERNATIONAL HYPERBARICS ASS: $14k → 10%BELLS OF THE CASCADES: $30k → 8%DILLEHAY MGT GROUP: $19k → 13%INDIANA ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHY: $11k → 16%SOUTHERN ILLINIOS UNIV: $12k → 12%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYS: $8k → 14%AVENTINE HEALTH SCIENCES: $9k → 16%AMERICAN BOARD OF LEGAL MEDIC: $9k → 6%PARAGON NURSING EDUCATION: $22k → 8%STONY BROOK SCHOOL OF MED: $10k → 7%NY STATE NURSES ASSN: $17k → 14%GOLDCASE INTERNATIONAL: $7k → 10%DILLEHAY MANAGEMENT GROUP: $19k → 13%AMERICAN BOARD OF LEGAL MEDIC: $8k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IN
NJ
CA
MD
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$270k · 8 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +153% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2020, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$270k
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+153%
+17%

Still filing today

25%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    NEW YORK STATE NURSES ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2017–2020 · $68k · revenue +43%
  • PN
    PARAGON NURSING EDUCATION
    2× · 2017–2019 · $44k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO
    2× · 2017–2019 · $39k

Funded once

  • BO
    BELLS OF THE CASCADES
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • N
    NACE
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
  • IH
    INTERNATIONAL HYPERBARICS ASS
    one grant, 2019 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
6/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW YORK STATE NURSES ASSOCIATION: $68,077 · OtherNEW YORK STATE NURSES ASSOCIATIONPARAGON NURSING EDUCATION: $43,616 · OtherPARAGON NURSING EDUCATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $39,061 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCODILLEHAY MGT GROUP: $38,426 · OtherDILLEHAY MGT GROUPBELLS OF THE CASCADES: $30,127 · OtherBELLS OF THE CASCADESTHE AMERICAN BOARD OF LEGAL MEDICINE INC: $17,700 · OtherNACE: $17,433 · OtherGLOBAL ORG FOR LEADERSHIP DEV: $17,259 · OtherWM CLAWSON ENTERPRISES INC: $16,304 · OtherINTERNATIONAL HYPERBARICS ASS: $13,736 · Other+7 more: $67,383 · Other+7 moreFACULTY STUDENT ASSOCIATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY AT STONY BROOK INC: $29,650 · EducationFACULTY ST…LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $7,505 · EducationLOYOLA UNI…
Other$369,122Education$37,155

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW YORK STATE NURSES ASSOCIATION: $68,077 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFACULTY STUDENT ASSOCIATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY AT STONY BROOK INC: $29,650 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPINELLAS COUNTY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC: $12,116 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetTEXAS CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE: $9,101 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $7,505 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW YORK STATE NURSES ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FACULTY STUDENT ASSOCIATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY AT STONY BROOK INC ↗
  • Who funds PINELLAS COUNTY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Continuing Education Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Continuing Education Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Continuing Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home