Skip to content

· Public charity

Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials

The consortium for research on renewable industrial material's (corrim) mission seeks to establish, support and manage research, and education programs related to the production, use, and final disposal of wood products including forestry operations and liquid and solid cellulosic fuels.

$928k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$390k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Youth Development$1.1MEnvironment$420kEducation$95kCommunity Improvement$76kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $852,322, the rows itemized in this filing. The $927,555 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $75,233 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $183k
  • $250k+2 grants · $669k
$278,922
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CIRCULAR BY DESIGN LLC$390,000
WOODLIFE$278,922
Individual grant recipient$183,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%US ENDOWMENT: $69k → 10%HUBBARD FOREST SOLUTIONS LLC: $30k → 10%WOODLIFE: $347k → 18%WILSON BIOCHAR: $183k → 18%NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%CIRCULAR BY DESIGN LLC: $390k → 9%WOODLIFE: $279k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $30k → 9%WOODLIFE: $79k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $8k → 9%WOODLIFE: $76k → 18%WEYERHAEUSER: $11k → 9%WOODLIFE: $72k → 18%WOODLIFE: $42k → 18%WOODLIFE: $35k → 18%WOODLIFE: $35k → 18%WOODLIFE: $30k → 18%WOODLIFE: $30k → 18%WOODLIFE: $26k → 18%WOODLIFE: $20k → 18%WOODLIFE: $13k → 18%WOODLIFE: $6k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 4 repeat orgs$713k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$1.2M
$140k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $573k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • W
    WOODLIFE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.1M
  • CC
    COLDSTREAM CONSULTING LTD
    5× · 2018–2022 · $76k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    2× · 2018–2019 · $38k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $69k
  • HF
    HUBBARD FOREST SOLUTIONS LLC
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • NS
    NC STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2018 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOODLIFE: $1,088,812 · OtherWOODLIFECIRCULAR BY DESIGN LLC: $390,000 · OtherCIRCULAR BY DESIGN LLCIndividual grant recipient: $183,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOLDSTREAM CONSULTING LTD: $75,938 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $68,700 · Other+6 more: $145,534 · Other+6 more
Other$1,952,384

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials?

Find your warmest path to Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials’ filings →

More from the funding graph