Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Consortium for Elections & Political Process Strengthening

The consortium for elections and political process strengthening (cepps) is a 501(c)(3) organization and a legal joint venture of three equal partners: the international foundation for electoral systems (ifes), the international republican institute (iri), and the national democratic institute (ndi). Cepps was created in 1995 to address…

$93M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
3
Grants FY2025
3
Organizations funded FY2024
33%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$27,520,595
Largest grant, FY2025
$40,105,370
Organizations funded a year
3 to 3
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$2.3M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 33% of the organizations Consortium for Elections & Political Process Strengthening funded were first-time grantees, receiving 29% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving3$93M0%
FY20243$178M33%
FY20233$165M0%
FY20223$161M0%
FY20213$147M0%
FY20203$120M0%
FY20193$117M0%
FY20183$80M0%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Benefit$693MInternational$356M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Compare Consortium for Elections & Political Process Strengthening with peer funders

About Consortium for Elections & Political Process Strengthening

How much does Consortium for Elections & Political Process Strengthening give?
Consortium for Elections & Political Process Strengthening reported 3 grants totaling $93,113,093 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 3 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Consortium for Elections & Political Process Strengthening fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Public Benefit (66%), International (34%).
Who are Consortium for Elections & Political Process Strengthening's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: National Democratic Institute for International Affairs ($471M), International Republican Institute ($322M), Consortium for Elections & Political Process Strengthening ($268M).
Does Consortium for Elections & Political Process Strengthening fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Consortium for Elections & Political Process Strengthening based?
Consortium for Elections & Political Process Strengthening is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Consortium for Elections & Political Process Strengthening’s filings →

More from the funding graph