Skip to content

· Public charity

Consortium for Educ Excellence

To assist public schools and colleges in launching and sustaining partnerships to raise student aspirations and improve learning opportunities.

$178k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Youth Development$241kEducation$144k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $113k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$23,900
Median grant
1
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORIAH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$64,526
CROWN POINT CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$33,021
WILLSBORO CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$23,900
MALONE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$22,686
BEEKMANTOWN CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$22,078
AUSABLE VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$11,613
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CROWN POINT CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $33k → 13%AUSABLE VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $23k → 14%MALONE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $23k → 16%CROWN POINT CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $28k → 13%AUSABLE VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $12k → 14%MALONE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $14k → 16%WILLSBORO CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $29k → 13%BEEKMANTOWN CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $70k → 14%MORIAH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $65k → 13%BEEKMANTOWN CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $22k → 14%WILLSBORO CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $24k → 13%MORIAH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $43k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$385k · 6 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
0

Total granted

$385k
$0

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MORIAH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
    2× · 2024–2025 · $108k
  • BC
    BEEKMANTOWN CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
    2× · 2024–2025 · $92k
  • CP
    CROWN POINT CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
    2× · 2024–2025 · $61k

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2024–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2024 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    0/0
    Grantees still filing
    0/0
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    MORIAH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $107,988 · OtherMORIAH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTBEEKMANTOWN CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $92,146 · OtherBEEKMANTOWN CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTCROWN POINT CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $60,972 · OtherCROWN POINT CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTWILLSBORO CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $53,100 · OtherWILLSBORO CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTMALONE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $36,257 · OtherMALONE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTAUSABLE VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $34,866 · OtherAUSABLE VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
    Other$385,329

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Consortium for Educ Excellence?

    Find your warmest path to Consortium for Educ Excellence through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Consortium for Educ Excellence’s filings →

    More from the funding graph