Skip to content

Michigan · Public charity

Conservative Energy Network

To champion secure, reliable, affordable, clean American energy.

$2.5M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
10
Grants FY2024
10
Organizations funded FY2023
20%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$209,690
Largest grant, FY2024
$592,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 10
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
10
Total assets, FY2024
$5.9M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 20% of the organizations Conservative Energy Network funded were first-time grantees, receiving 23% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $600k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentSocial ScienceEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving10$2.4M0%
FY202310$2.6M20%
FY20228$2.7M0%
FY20217$1.9M0%
FY202010$2.3M40%
FY20199$1.5M44%
FY20186$967k67%
FY20173$108kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$12MPublic Benefit$2.3MEducation$63k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MI
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Conservatives for Clean Energy Inc$4,908,447789%
The Western Way Organization$1,590,000497%
Ohio Conservative Energy Forum Attn Tony Zartman$1,374,922799%
Minnesota Conservative Energy Forum$1,287,711889%
Michigan Conservative Energy Forum$1,255,236769%
Pennsylvania Conservative Energy Forum$1,056,299683%
Wisconsin Conservative Energy Forum Inc$894,8516n/a
Conservative Texans for Energy Innovation$752,7172n/a
Indiana Conservative Alliance For$551,7345n/a
Iowa Conservative Energy Forum$355,9442n/a
Show all 17 grantees
All grantees of Conservative Energy Network by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Conservatives for Clean Energy Inc$4,908,447789%
The Western Way Organization$1,590,000497%
Ohio Conservative Energy Forum Attn Tony Zartman$1,374,922799%
Minnesota Conservative Energy Forum$1,287,711889%
Michigan Conservative Energy Forum$1,255,236769%
Pennsylvania Conservative Energy Forum$1,056,299683%
Wisconsin Conservative Energy Forum Inc$894,8516n/a
Conservative Texans for Energy Innovation$752,7172n/a
Indiana Conservative Alliance For$551,7345n/a
Iowa Conservative Energy Forum$355,9442n/a
Earth Stewardship Alliance$180,350427%
Joseph Rainey Center for Public Policy$135,000253%
The University of Texas Foundation No 1$63,0781n/a
Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions Forum$50,00011%
American Legislative Exchange Council$27,0002n/a
The Reason Foundation$24,00010%
American Conservation Coalition Inc$10,00013%

Where it is load-bearing

Conservative Energy Network supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 8 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 11 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetConservatives for Clean Energy Inc: $4,908,447 over 7y, 89% of budgetThe Western Way Organization: $1,590,000 over 4y, 97% of budgetOhio Conservative Energy Forum Attn Tony Zartman: $1,374,922 over 7y, 99% of budgetMinnesota Conservative Energy Forum: $1,287,711 over 8y, 89% of budgetMichigan Conservative Energy Forum: $1,255,236 over 7y, 69% of budgetPennsylvania Conservative Energy Forum: $1,056,299 over 6y, 83% of budgetEarth Stewardship Alliance: $180,350 over 4y, 27% of budgetJoseph Rainey Center for Public Policy: $135,000 over 2y, 53% of budgetCitizens for Responsible Energy Solutions Forum: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetThe Reason Foundation: $24,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Conservation Coalition Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Energy FoundationCA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Energy Foundation · United States Energy Foundation · Conservatives for a Clean Energy Future

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Conservative Energy Network with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Conservative Energy Network?

Find your warmest path to Conservative Energy Network through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Conservative Energy Network

How much does Conservative Energy Network give?
Conservative Energy Network reported 10 grants totaling $2,454,575 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 10 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Conservative Energy Network fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Environment (84%), Public Benefit (16%), Education (0%).
Who are Conservative Energy Network's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Conservatives for Clean Energy Inc ($4.9M), The Western Way Organization ($1.6M), Ohio Conservative Energy Forum Attn Tony Zartman ($1.4M).
Does Conservative Energy Network fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Conservative Energy Network?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Energy Foundation, United States Energy Foundation, Conservatives for a Clean Energy Future.
Where is Conservative Energy Network based?
Conservative Energy Network is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Conservative Energy Network’s filings →

More from the funding graph