· Public charity
Conservation Innovation Fund
To increase the velocity and the scale of conservation efforts in the united states and to support the growing development of the conservation finance sector.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $958k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MARYLAND & VIRGINIA MILK PRODUCERS COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION | $213,546 |
| AGGROW TECH LLC | $194,725 |
| ECOSYSTEM SERVICES MARKET CONSORTIUM | $186,321 |
| STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER | $159,755 |
| ALLIANCE FOR THE CHESAPEAKE BAY | $134,523 |
| ALLIANCE FOR THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY | $69,016 |
| COSERVATION FOUNDATION OF LANCASTER COUNTY DBA LANCASTER CLEAN WATER PARTNE | $7,616 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $264k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MVMARYLAND & VIRGINIA MILK PRODUCERS COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION2× · 2024–2025 · $370k
- ESECOSYSTEM SERVICES MARKET CONSORTIUM2× · 2024–2025 · $283k · revenue +34%
- SWSTROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER2× · 2024–2025 · $280k · revenue 0%
Funded once
- CLCOOL LAWN LLCone grant, 2024 · $733k
- DDDAVIS DAIRYone grant, 2024 · $277k
- ZHZIMMERMANS'S HILLTOP DAIRYone grant, 2024 · $270k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Conservation Innovation Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Conservation Innovation Fund. Bigger dots raise more.
- Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Inc: 28% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Conservation Innovation Fund?
Find your warmest path to Conservation Innovation Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Conservation Innovation’s filings →