Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Connecticut Education Association Inc

The association promotes quality public education through advancing the teaching profession.

$424k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$59k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.7MMembership Benefit$28k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $255,054 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $423,603 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $168,549 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $59k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$46M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOLLAND EDUCATION ASSN$59,244
CT STEM ACADEMY$40,000
FAIRFIELD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$25,000
WATERBURY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$25,000
BRIDGEPORT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$25,000
STAMFORD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$25,000
WALLINGFORD EDUCATION ASSN$7,000
HAMDEN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$7,000
DANBURY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$7,000
MILFORD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$7,000
MANCHESTER EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$7,000
WESTPORT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$7,000
EAST HARTFORD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$7,000
GREENWICH EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$6,810
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 18 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
3

Total granted

$1.7M
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+68%

Still filing today

83%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    CONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $335k · revenue +22% · 49% of their budget
  • CE
    CONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION WTBY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $226k · revenue +581%
  • CM
    CEA MANCHESTER EDUCATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $86k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • CE
    CONNECTICUT EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $31k · revenue +68%
  • CC
    CENTRAL CT STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • CE
    CONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
East Williston Teachers Association Scholarship Foundation
Education
2
Pta Connecticut Congress

Educational

3
Connetquot Teachers Association Inc

The connetquot teachers association aims to obtain bargaining rights, including the right to strike, for teachers, paraprofessionals and school-related personnel employed by the board of education of the connetquot school district. the…

4
Ptsa Connecticut Congress

School pta

5
California Teachers Association

Contract negotiation for teachers

6
Thompson Education Association

The Organization represents about 650 Teachers & other Educational Professionals in the implementing, improving and coordinating programs of the profession.

7
California Federation of Teachers Disaster Relief Fund
Membership Benefit
8
Technology Association of Iowa Education Foundation
Community Improvement
9
Connecticut Education Association Inc

The association promotes quality public education through advancing the teaching profession.

Education
10
American Federation of Teachers

Teachers association

11
Farmington Education Association

Labor Union

12
Fall River Educators' Association Inc

Serve as a collective bargaining unit for the fall river, massachusetts teachers.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connecticut Education Association and the most unlike its peers is Ct Stem Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $334,773 · OtherCONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONCONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $227,552 · OtherCONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONCONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION WTBY — $225,695 · OtherCONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION WTBYFAIRFIELD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $134,105 · OtherFAIRFIELD EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONCEA MANCHESTER EDUCATION — $86,308 · OtherGREENWICH EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $71,636 · OtherMILFORD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $67,576 · OtherCONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION WESTPORT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC — $63,796 · OtherCONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $59,244 · OtherNATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION IN DANBURY — $56,755 · Other+11 more — $367,048 · Other+11 moreCT Stem Academy Inc — $80,000 · Education
Other$1,694,488Education$80,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $334,773 over 9y, 49% of budgetCONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $227,552 over 9y, 11% of budgetCONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION WTBY — $225,695 over 9y, 14% of budgetCEA MANCHESTER EDUCATION — $86,308 over 9y, 23% of budgetCT Stem Academy Inc — $80,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetGREENWICH EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $71,636 over 9y, 6.6% of budgetMILFORD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $67,576 over 9y, 8.8% of budgetCONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION WESTPORT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC — $63,796 over 9y, 6.8% of budgetNATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION IN DANBURY — $56,755 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetWEST HARTFORD EDUCATION ASSN INC — $56,293 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetCEA EAST HARTFORD EDUCATION ASSOC — $56,000 over 8y, 6.5% of budgetCONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION WALLINGFORD — $49,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetCONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $46,481 over 6y, 12% of budgetTRUMBULL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $42,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetCONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $37,954 over 5y, 11% of budgetCONNECTICUT EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $30,600 over 1y, 18% of budgetCONNECTITUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $20,700 over 3y, 9.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION WTBY
  • Who funds CEA MANCHESTER EDUCATION
  • Who funds CT Stem Academy Inc
  • Who funds GREENWICH EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds MILFORD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION WESTPORT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION IN DANBURY
  • Who funds WEST HARTFORD EDUCATION ASSN INC
  • Who funds CEA EAST HARTFORD EDUCATION ASSOC
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION WALLINGFORD
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds TRUMBULL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CONNECTITUT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Connecticut Education Association Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 120%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    12get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph