Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Pennsylvania · Public charity

Congregational Homes Inc D/B/A Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh

To foster an environment that emanates the utmost respect for the dignity of our residents, their families, staff, volunteers and others.to employ highly qualified individuals who possess integrity of character and who exhibit compassionate care to our residents and familiesto maintain the highest possible standards of quality in every…

$3.6M
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Congregational Homes Inc D/B/A Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh’s FY2022 grant dollars went to The Pittsburgh Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Median grant, FY2022
$3,561,669
Largest grant, FY2022
$3,561,669
States reached, FY2022
1

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2022.

THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION$3,561,669

Compare Congregational Homes Inc D/B/A Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh with peer funders

About Congregational Homes Inc D/B/A Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh

How much does Congregational Homes Inc D/B/A Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh give?
Congregational Homes Inc D/B/A Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh reported 1 grants totaling $3,561,669 in its FY2022 IRS filing.
What does Congregational Homes Inc D/B/A Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh fund?
By grant dollars, its largest causes are Philanthropy (100%).
Where is Congregational Homes Inc D/B/A Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh based?
Congregational Homes Inc D/B/A Fair Oaks of Pittsburgh is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home