Skip to content

· Public charity

Confederation of North Central American and Caribbean Association Football (Concacaf)

Concacaf's mission is to support and promote soccer ("football") in north america, central america, and the caribbean, thereby promoting the common interests of its forty-one member national soccer associations or governing bodies in the region, through activities such as organizing and managing international soccer tournaments.

$31M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$320k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$7.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $910,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $30,633,513 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $29,723,513 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k4 grants · $590k
  • $250k+1 grant · $320k
$245,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$155M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USVI SOCCER FEDERATION$320,000
PUERTO RICAN FOOTBALL FEDERATION$245,000
US SOCCER FEDERATION INC$245,000
PUERTO RICAN FOOTBALL FEDERATION$50,000
US SOCCER FEDERATION INC$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%KRAFT SOCCER LLC: $70k → 7%Pennsylvania Professional Soccer LLC: $210k → 10%LOS ANGELES FOOTBALL CLUB: $280k → 14%NEW YORK CITY FOOTBALL CLUB LLC: $210k → 17%AUSTIN FC: $70k → 13%ORLANDO CITY SOCCER CLUB: $70k → 13%Portland TimbersPortland Thorns: $140k → 12%Atlanta United FC: $155k → 13%COLORADO RAPIDS: $70k → 12%Crew SC Team Company LLC: $140k → 17%SEATTLE SOUNDERS FC: $280k → 9%US Soccer Federation: $500k → 14%PHILADELPHIA UNION: $210k → 10%Los Angeles Football Club (LAFC) Sports LLC: $85k → 14%New York City Football Club LLC: $155k → 17%Atlanta United FC: $140k → 13%Seattle Sounders FC: $70k → 9%US SOCCER FEDERATION INC: $300k → 14%US SOCCER FEDERATION INC: $195k → 14%US Soccer Federation: $150k → 14%US Soccer Federation Inc: $150k → 14%US SOCCER FEDERATION INC: $75k → 14%US Soccer Federation Inc: $50k → 14%US SOCCER FEDERATION INC: $350k → 14%US SOCCER FEDERATION INC: $270k → 14%US SOCCER FEDERATION INC: $245k → 14%US SOCCER FEDERATION INC: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CA
CO
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $30M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$28M · 94% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: ONE CONCACAF PROGRAM · TEAM TRAVEL · PRTICIPATION

North America (Canada and Mexico)$1.2M · 4% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: TEAM TRAVEL · ONE CONCACAF PROGRAM · PARTICIPATION

South America$600k · 2% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: TEAM TRAVEL

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.0M · 8 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$7.0M
$1.4M

Still filing today

25%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UNITED STATES SOCCER FEDERATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +94%
  • US
    USVI SOCCER FEDERATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +15%
  • PR
    PUERTO RICAN FOOTBALL FEDERATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1.1M

Funded once

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES FOOTBALL CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $280k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $210k
  • PP
    Pennsylvania Professional Soccer LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $210k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
2/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PUERTO RICAN FOOTBALL FEDERATION: $1,101,952 · OtherPUERTO RICAN FOOTBALL FEDERATIONPUERTO RICAN FOOTBAL FEDERATION: $978,500 · OtherPUERTO RICAN FOOTBAL FEDERATIONNEW YORK CITY FOOTBALL CLUB LLC: $365,000 · OtherNEW YORK CITY FOOTBALL CLUB LLCIndividual grant recipient: $350,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $295,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLOS ANGELES FOOTBALL CLUB: $280,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES FOOTBALL CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $210,000 · OtherPennsylvania Professional Soccer LLC: $210,000 · Other+9 more: $725,000 · Other+9 moreUNITED STATES SOCCER FEDERATION: $2,335,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES SOCCER FEDERATIONUSVI SOCCER FEDERATION: $1,535,000 · Recreation & SportsUSVI SOCCER FEDERATION
Other$4,515,452Recreation & Sports$3,870,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED STATES SOCCER FEDERATION: $2,335,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUSVI SOCCER FEDERATION: $1,535,000 over 5y, 19% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED STATES SOCCER FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds USVI SOCCER FEDERATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Confederation of North Central American and Caribbean Association Football (Concacaf) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Confederation of North Central American and Caribbean Association Football (Concacaf). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Confederation of North Central American and Caribbean Association Football (Concacaf)’s filings →

    More from the funding graph