Skip to content
Concern Worldwide (Us) Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Concern Worldwide (Us) Inc

Our mission is to help people living in extreme poverty achieve major improvements in their lives that last and spread without ongoing support from concern.

$59M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$245k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

80% of Concern Worldwide (Us) Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to President And Fellows Of Harvard College, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
1
’18
1
’19
1
’20
1
’21
1
’22
1
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.3MInternational$1.1MScience & Tech$539k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $304,781, the rows itemized in this filing. The $58,900,242 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $58,595,461 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$244,568
Median grant
2
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$244,568
INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS$60,213
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 37% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $302k → 8%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $240k → 14%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $46k → 19%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $300k → 8%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $145k → 14%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $267k → 8%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $134k → 14%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $245k → 8%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $133k → 14%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $212k → 8%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $127k → 14%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $194k → 8%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $106k → 14%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $173k → 8%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $89k → 14%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $154k → 8%INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $60k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $59M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$31M · 52% · 7 grants

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO COUNTRY OFFICES TO SUPPORT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES - BURKINA FASO VIA CONCERN IRELAND · GRANTS TO COUNTRY OFFICES TO SUPPORT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES - DRC VIA CONCERN IRELAND · GRANTS TO COUNTRY OFFICES TO SUPPORT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES - ETHIOPIA VIA CONCERN IRELAND

Middle East and North Africa$15M · 26% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO COUNTRY OFFICES TO SUPPORT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES - LEBANON VIA CONCERN IRELAND · GRANTS TO COUNTRY OFFICES TO SUPPORT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES - SUDAN VIA CONCERN IRELAND · GRANTS TO COUNTRY OFFICES TO SUPPORT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES - SYRIA VIA CONCERN IRELAND

South Asia$7.6M · 13% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO COUNTRY OFFICES TO SUPPORT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES - AFGHANISTAN VIA CONCERN IRELAND · GRANTS TO COUNTRY OFFICES TO SUPPORT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES - BANGLADESH VIA CONCERN IRELAND · GRANTS TO COUNTRY OFFICES TO SUPPORT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES - PAKISTAN VIA CONCERN IRELAND

Central America and the Caribbean$4.0M · 7% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO COUNTRY OFFICES TO SUPPORT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES - HAITI VIA CONCERN IRELAND

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$1.4M · 2% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO COUNTRY OFFICES TO SUPPORT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES - VIA CONCERN IRELAND. FUNDS SUPPORT EMERGENCY PROGRAMMING · GRANTS TO COUNTRY OFFICES TO SUPPORT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES - UKRAINE VIA CONCERN IRELAND

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 3 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
2/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

President and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,845,993 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $1,033,802 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPSJOHNS HOPKINS U SCHOOL OF MED: $46,089 · Other
Education$1,845,993International$1,033,802Other$46,089

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,845,993 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $1,033,802 over 8y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Concern Worldwide (Us) Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Concern Worldwide (Us) Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Concern Worldwide (Us)’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home