Skip to content
Comp Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Comp Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$149k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$562kHealth$28kEducation$23kHuman Services$11kArts & Culture$2kPhilanthropy$2kFood & Nutrition$603Other$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $77k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $72k
$3,216
Median grant
2
States reached
$24k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Yad Yosef$23,000
Sephardic Bikur Holim$14,166
Yeshivah of Flatbush$12,360
SHAAREI MORDECHAI$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,360
Mikdash Eliyahu$9,003
RABBI YOSEF MIZRACHI KIRUV ORGANIZATION$8,250
Nefesh$7,500
Individual grant recipient$6,420
HEICHAL MORDECHAI$6,240
YESHIVA GEDOLAH BAIS YISROEL$5,000
CONGREGATION ARAM SOBA$5,000
Ilan High School$3,600
TIFERET CHAIM$3,600
Magen David Synagogue$3,216
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Jewish Community Council of Greater Coney Island: $100 → 20%YAD DOVID INC: $1k → 15%Israel Medical Fund: $2k → 17%Israel Medical Fund: $2k → 17%Israel Medical Fund: $1k → 17%The Special Childrens Center: $2k → 11%The Special Childrens Center: $2k → 11%The Special Childrens Center: $2k → 11%The Special Childrens Center: $2k → 11%The Special Childrens Center: $501 → 11%Michael Kameo Foundation: $301 → 6%A Time: $2k → 20%A Time: $2k → 20%ATIME: $2k → 20%Bonei Olam: $2k → 20%A Time: $360 → 20%Ahava Baby: $301 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$613k · 43 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
43

Total granted

$613k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+17%

Still filing today

37%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionEducationHealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +88%
  • IH
    ILAN HIGH SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +22%
  • AT
    A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange
    4× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • CL
    CONGREGATION LEV AHARON INC
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
  • YH
    YELLOW HOUSE
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
  • NS
    New Springville Jewish Center
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
3
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
4
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
5
Friends of Yeshiva Tehilas Shlomo Inc

Provide support to further jewish education

Philanthropy
6
Yeshiva Yesodei Hachaim

To provide secondary high school education in Brooklyn, NY

—
7
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
9
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
10
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
11
The Yad Moach Vlev Foundation
Philanthropy
12
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shaare Mordechai Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yellow House Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/35
Grantees still filing
20/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAGEN DAVID SYNAGOGUE: $83,286 · OtherMAGEN DAVID SYNAGOGUEYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH: $82,190 · OtherYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSHSephardic Bikur Holim: $76,467 · OtherSephardic Bikur HolimIndividual grant recipient: $74,867 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $28,970 · OtherCongregation Shaare Zion: $28,641 · OtherYAD YOSEF: $24,800 · OtherNEFESH: $22,600 · Other+55 more: $192,959 · Other+55 moreHeichal Mordechai Inc: $11,240 · EducationILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $7,600 · EducationBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $5,400 · EducationYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $5,200 · EducationMATTEH MOSHE INC: $2,600 · Education+2 more: $201 · EducationSHAARE MORDECHAI INC: $14,501 · ReligionTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $8,000 · ReligionBNEI MELACHIM INC: $4,602 · ReligionSHIRAT DAVID INC: $2,400 · Religion+4 more: $2,703 · ReligionTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $7,701 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $6,260 · Human ServicesISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $4,600 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $1,800 · Human ServicesYAD DOVID INC: $1,000 · Human Services+3 more: $702 · Human ServicesCHAI LIFELINE INC: $5,450 · HealthNew York Cancer Center Inc: $5,400 · HealthYELLOW HOUSE FOUNDATION: $3,001 · Health+1 more: $101 · HealthUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $1,604 · PhilanthropyKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC co BERNATH & ROSENBERG PC: $180 · PhilanthropyTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $603 · Food & Nutrition
Other$614,780Education$32,241Religion$32,206Human Services$22,063Health$13,952Philanthropy$2,784Food & Nutrition$603

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHAARE MORDECHAI INC: $14,501 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHeichal Mordechai Inc: $11,240 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $7,701 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $7,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEV AHARON: $6,560 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $6,260 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SEPHARDIC STUDIES: $6,162 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $5,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNew York Cancer Center Inc: $5,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $5,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $5,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBNEI MELACHIM INC: $4,602 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $4,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOW HOUSE FOUNDATION: $3,001 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMATTEH MOSHE INC: $2,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHIRAT DAVID INC: $2,400 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $1,604 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYAD DOVID INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $703 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $603 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPorat Yoseph Foundation: $501 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMICHAEL M KAMEO FOUNDATION INC: $301 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAHAVA BABY INC: $301 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC co BERNATH & ROSENBERG PC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMABAS FUND INC: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN EZER LNEFESH: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF GREATER CONEY ISLAND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHAARE MORDECHAI INC ↗
  • Who funds Heichal Mordechai Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ILAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEV AHARON ↗
  • Who funds A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR SEPHARDIC STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds New York Cancer Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds BARKAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA KETER TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds BNEI MELACHIM INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Howard Hoffman & …Jewish Communal FundThe Setton FoundationIc Hessed FoundationE R G FoundationThe Jimmy and Berta K…Jack D Cohen Foundati…The Ralph S Gindi Fam…The Amin and Lillian …Isaac & Marjorie Gind…Cabasso Family Founda…
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY70.1× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Setton Foundation · Ic Hessed Foundation · E R G Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Cabasso Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Comp Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Comp Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Comp Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Comp Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Comp’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home