Skip to content
Community Health Systems Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Community Health Systems Inc

To support and encourage health care and related services through providing strategic planning, oversight, management, supervision, administrative services and other essential functions to section 501(c)(3) supported organizations within an integrated health care delivery system.

$9.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4.9M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Health$101M
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,831,866
Median grant
1
States reached
$179M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOME & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$4,894,717
CLINICAL SERVICES INC$3,831,866
PIEDMONT REGIONAL HEALTH INC$902,151
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $58.9M → 12%HEALTH SCHOLARSHIPS INC: $15.7M → 12%CLINICAL SERVICES INC: $6.5M → 12%HEALTH SYSTEMS FACILITIES INC: $5.0M → 12%HOME & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $4.9M → 12%CLINICAL SERVICES INC: $3.8M → 12%HOME & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $2.9M → 12%PIEDMONT REGIONAL HEALTH INC: $1.6M → 12%PIEDMONT REGIONAL HEALTH INC: $902k → 12%COMMUNITY REHABILITATION SERVICES: $363k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21M · 3 repeat orgs$80M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
4

Total granted

$21M
$80M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
-2%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CLINICAL SERVICES INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10M · revenue +1%
  • HC
    HOME & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $7.8M · revenue +33%
  • PR
    PIEDMONT REGIONAL HEALTH INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $59M · revenue -91% · 91% of their budget
  • HS
    HEALTH SCHOLARSHIPS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $16M · revenue +6%
  • HS
    HEALTH SYSTEMS FACILITIES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5.0M · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $58,927,229 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION INCCLINICAL SERVICES INC: $10,339,052 · HealthCLINICAL SERVICES INCHOME & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $7,805,692 · HealthHOME & COMMUNITY SERVICES INCHEALTH SYSTEMS FACILITIES INC: $4,988,150 · HealthHEALTH SYSTEMS FACILITIES INC+2 more: $2,869,353 · HealthHEALTH SCHOLARSHIPS INC: $15,742,295 · EducationHEALTH SCHOLARSHI…
Health$84,929,476Education$15,742,295

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $58,927,229 over 1y, 91% of budgetHEALTH SCHOLARSHIPS INC: $15,742,295 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetCLINICAL SERVICES INC: $10,339,052 over 2y, 17% of budgetHOME & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $7,805,692 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetHEALTH SYSTEMS FACILITIES INC: $4,988,150 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetPIEDMONT REGIONAL HEALTH INC: $2,506,173 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY REHABILITATION SERVICES INC: $363,180 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Health Systems Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Health Systems Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Health Systems’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home